People should be able to carry guns only if they have a license and for protection. Other wise their is really no point in carrying a gun. ***** Above is an opinion. I would ask why not? Are the majority of people honest and law abiding? Having a firearm does not change that.
Your question calls for an opinion. If a person is a law abiding, sane adult, there is no reason they should NOT carry a gun. Unless you think they should not be able to defend themselves from criminals.
Yes.
never
in most cases, yes.
If you take the example of the UK (where guns are banned), the normal police on duty on the streets are not armed with guns. There are UK police trained to use and carry guns but they only do so when responding to a situation where a criminal is seen to be armed. Based on this tried example, is is clear that if guns were banned effectively, the police would not need to carry weapons.
Yes. They would not be very effective against criminals with guns with just a badge.
No they carry spud guns
what guns do the mushes carry at the iditarod
FBI employees are not required to carry guns.
this is a very opinion based question. i will give you my opinion. i belive that the process we have now to legally carry a gun is just fine. A gun or a knife never killed anyone without help. But logically yes it should should be able to be carried otherwise how else would you be able to get it from point A to point B?
Your question assumes that people shouldn't be able to buy guns "in the market", whatever that means, which is far from proven.