Well, you could go for the obvious answer: people talking about you, whether what they are saying is positive or negative is proof that you have in some way made an impact on them. On the contrary, if you are not talked about by those same people, then the possibility exists that you have made no impact on them whatsoever. People discussing you (or not) could be used as a marker of your fame... or your infamy. There is also another option to consider, though - if you are not being talked about because the impact you have had on those same people is so great that it transcends words, then maybe it would be better not to be talked about. Lol - hope that helps.
Really... You have to get to know him better. He might not be the person you think he is.
You would say "Jack and Jill talked briefly."
No, cowboys are not better than Indians, though some might believe they are. Of course, others might believe Indians are better than cowboys.
probably
Conversed.
it might have better training
i think they all talked. i know that Lauren graham got along better with david sutcliffe better than Scott Patterson, ironic much?
dark chocolate is better than you even when you might think that it's nasty!
Your choiceIts really your choice because you might think that marmite is better than butter or butter is better than marmite!
James Madison talked better lying down...
Some people are better dancers than others because their coordination might be better.
Are you kidding me, Kakashi wins buy a landslide. True, the reason that it seems might guy is better than kakashi is because he never tries his best.