0
Why is first-hand evidence more reliable than second-hand evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
First-hand evidence is evidence that comes from someone that witnessed/was apart of whatever the situation is. For example, if there was a fire in a building, and you were trying to figure out what caused it, you would interview those who were in the building around the time of the fire. That would be first-hand evidence. Second-hand evidence would be people who were outside at the time of the fire, or people who were not directly witnessing the event. It is more reliable because the people were right there, and have a personal account of what happened.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
First-hand evidence is more reliable because it comes directly from the source, making it less prone to errors or bias that can occur with second-hand information. First-hand evidence also allows for a more accurate and complete understanding of the situation or knowledge being conveyed compared to second-hand evidence, which may be subject to misinterpretation or misinformation through repeated transmission.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Conclusion must be based on several evidence?
Conclusions based on multiple pieces of evidence are more robust and reliable because they consider a broader set of information. By synthesizing various data points, trends, and sources, a conclusion can be more comprehensive and less prone to biases or errors that might arise from relying on a single piece of evidence. This approach also helps in developing a better understanding of the complexity of the issue at hand.
Are observational studys reliable?
Observational studies can provide valuable insights, but they have limitations. They can suggest associations between factors, but cannot prove causation. Factors like confounding variables and biases can impact the reliability of observational studies. It is important to interpret their results cautiously and consider other types of studies for more robust evidence.
Why is it possible to have a reliable measure that is not valid but impossible to have a valid measure that is not reliable?
A reliable measure is consistent and yields consistent results, so it may not be measuring the intended construct accurately (lack validity). On the other hand, a valid measure accurately assesses the intended construct, but it must be consistent and produce stable results (reliable) to ensure that the measurements are dependable and trustworthy.
Which of the observations listed below is the most reliable way to determine if a customer is intoxicated?
The most reliable way to determine if a customer is intoxicated is to observe their behavior for signs such as slurred speech, unsteady movements, and impaired judgment. Physical signs are more reliable indicators than subjective assessments or assumptions.
What may be the consequences of making subjective rather than objective observation statements?
Making subjective observation statements can lead to bias, misinterpretation, and lack of credibility in your observations. Objective observation statements are more reliable because they are based on facts and evidence, while subjective observations are influenced by personal feelings, opinions, and experiences. This can impact the accuracy and validity of your observations.
What is first hand information?
Firsthand information is information or knowledge that is based on a person's personal experience or direct observation of an event or situation. This type of information is considered more reliable and accurate compared to secondhand or thirdhand information.
What is a firsthand data?
Firsthand data is information that is collected directly from the source or through direct experience. This type of data is considered more reliable and accurate as it is obtained firsthand rather than being interpreted or communicated by others. Examples of firsthand data include observations, surveys, interviews, and experiments.
What are the symphtoms of second and smoke?
Secondhand smoke is just as dangerous if not more dangerous than firsthand smoke. In fact, 50% of the smoke from a cigarette turns into secondhand smoke. Also, when one is sucking on a cigarette, though it is very damaging, they blow out the smoke and also have the filter on the cigarette. By the time smoke gets to another person, they may just inhale it and cough, unknowing that they've just inhaled a lot of secondhand smoke. They also have no filter to protect them.
When was Something More - Secondhand Serenade song - created?
Something More - Secondhand Serenade song - was created on 2010-06-01.
What advantages do primary sources have over secondary sources?
Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of events, while secondary sources interpret or analyze information provided by primary sources. Primary sources are often more reliable and can provide unique perspectives that may not be found in secondary sources. They can offer a deeper understanding of historical events or issues.
Which evidence is more reliable artifacts or written records?
artifacts cause written records can just make up anything.
Why do you need to collect more data to obtain reliable data?
The more data you have, the more accurate your information. If you have a large amount of evidence of one result, it makes it look correct.
What is the meaning of the song 'Something More' by Secondhand Serenade?
It means that there is something more.
Do more people die from secondhand smoking or from smoking?
Smoking.
How harmful is secondhand smoke to a baby?
Secondhand smoke is terrible for anyone, and even more so for a baby or young child. SIS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) has ties to secondhand smoke. Asthma and allergy development have ties to exposure to secondhand smoke. As a baby's lungs are developing, exposure to the carcinogens in secondhand smoke can lead to serious health consequences.
How can electric heating systems be more reliable than gas heating systems?
Research has not provided any conclusive evidence as to why an electric heating system would be more reliable than a gas heating system. It is believed that both are equally reliable, and for cost efficiency it is quite a bit cheaper to heat with gas than it is with electric heat.
Why should evidence be material?
This question is vague. Evidence does not have to be material in all situations. In a debate, for example, you use your words and knowledge to hold your position. In court, evidence is generally material because someones future is at stake, and tangible evidence is probably more reliable and easily reevaluated after long periods of standstill in a case.
