0
What else can I help you with?
Are wizzards real?
People could argue that some things can't be explained so are therefore explained with things such as magic. So the answer to this question is there is no answer.
Why were some people for ratifying the constitution?
because some people try to be rebels and always have things to say
Why people argue?
Some people just like winning an argument. Some people simply enjoy debating.
Why do some people argue about Endangered Animals?
cause there stupid
What things do dragons not always have?
Legs and wings are some things thaat dragons NOT ALWAYS have. Legs and wings are some things have.
What were some problems with the constitution?
people argue sometimes. Thats just the way it is.
scientifically which tree is not a tree?
Some people argue that palms are not true trees.
Some people believe that there should be Fixed punishment for each type of crime.others argue that circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for commiting it should always be taken into?
....... taken into account when deciding on the punishment
What might you argue is a theme for Genesis?
Some people would argue that creation is the theme for Genesis. They forget that Genesis houses the stories of the first people on the earth and the expansion of the human race.
Why do family members argue?
People argue for many different reasons. Some can be about money or to marriage. Also, family member argue because they don't agree with each other and they both think they are right.
Is an atheist a bad person?
Not necessarily; first of all, many philosophers would argue that people aren't good or bad but that people do good or bad things. Some non-believers are extremely well respected people - Betrand Russell and David Attenborough come to mind. Some theists have done bad things; the 911 terrorists also come to mind.
Is it true to say some people argue as if it is a general truth that or it is better to say some people argue as if it were a general truth that?
Out of these two options, the former would be the better option. Because the sentence has the present tense of argue rather than the past tense, "argued", it would be appropriate to match it with the present tense verb of "is".
