answersLogoWhite

0

The northern colonies were more focused on industry and didn't have the right soil and climate to farm cotton (which is what slaves were used for). The southern states' relied on the export of cotton for profit while the north used cotton in industry during the industrial revolution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
More answers

The northern colonies had fewer slaves than the southern colonies mainly because their economy did not rely heavily on slave labor for large-scale agriculture like the southern colonies did. The northern colonies also had different industries such as shipping, trade, and manufacturing that did not require as much slave labor. Additionally, the cold climate and rocky terrain in the North were less conducive to large plantations that required a significant number of slaves.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did the northern colonies have fewer slaves than the southern slaves?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

What place had the most indentured servants and few slaves?

The majority of indentured servants were in the northern colonies, such as New York and Pennsylvania, while the southern colonies, like Virginia and South Carolina, had more slaves due to their reliance on plantation agriculture. Of these, Virginia had the most indentured servants, while South Carolina had relatively fewer slaves compared to other southern colonies.


What percent of southern whites owned fewer than 5slaves?

Around 75% of southern whites owned fewer than five slaves. The majority of white southerners owned no slaves at all, as slaves were primarily held by a small percentage of wealthy plantation owners.


Why did the southern states not want slaves counted as residents in their states?

Actually it would have been helpful to have each slave counted as a full person because that would have meant more representatives in Congress. It was the northern colonies that didn't want the slaves counted as whole person. The south all ready had the largest States and to add the slave population in would have made them very powerful. By 1860 there would be 6 million slaves in the south so counting them as 3/4ths of a person wasn't great, but better than counting them as a whole person.


What was the extent of slavery among the Southern white population?

A very small percentage of White Southerners owned slaves before The Civil War, something around 5%. However, Slaveowners would rent slaves to non slave owning farmers for a few days work. That way small farmers could get their crops planted and harvested. Still, most of the time small farmers would do most of the work on their own farms.


What are differences between serfs and slaves?

Serfs were tied to the land and could not be sold, whereas slaves were considered property and were often bought and sold. Serfs typically had some rights and were subject to fewer harsh treatments compared to slaves. Serfs were also a part of the feudal system, while slaves were seen as items of property in various societies.