Eastern church already had an emperor.
Hope that helps :)
The crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans in 800 AD by Pope Leo III symbolized a significant shift in power dynamics, asserting the authority of the Western Church and its leaders over the Byzantine Empire, which considered itself the continuation of the Roman Empire. This act was perceived by the Byzantine Emperor, Justinian II, as an affront, leading to a deterioration of relations between the Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic Churches. The crowning deepened the existing cultural and political divides, as it emphasized the West's claim to imperial legitimacy while undermining the East's historical role. Consequently, this event set the stage for centuries of tension and rivalry between the two regions.
The crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE significantly increased tensions between the Eastern and Western Roman Empires. This act was perceived by the Byzantine Empire, which considered itself the continuation of the Roman Empire, as a direct challenge to its authority and legitimacy. The West's embrace of a new imperial identity under Charlemagne created a rift, as the Eastern Empire viewed itself as the rightful successor to Roman rule. This event marked a deepening divide that would contribute to the eventual schism between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.
he spread education and religion throughout the eastern area! duhh
The event that significantly increased tensions between the East and West in 800 AD was the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III. This act not only symbolized a revival of the Western Roman Empire but also highlighted the growing divide between the Latin West and the Greek East, particularly in terms of religious and political authority. The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) viewed this crowning as a challenge to its legitimacy and sovereignty, further exacerbating the schism between the two branches of Christianity.
After the death of his son the empire was divided between his (Louis, the sons of Charlemagne) three sons, as was common in his culture. De title of "holy Roman Emperor" was given to the most eastern part, today known as Germany. That is also the reason that Germany was known as "the Holy Roman Empire" until 1806. So it was his son who first divided his empire, but it existed until 1806.
Felix Dillier has written: 'Kirche am Wendepunkt' -- subject(s): Eastern churches, Doctrines, Schism, Relations, Eastern and Western Church, Oriental rites, Catholic Church
Efforts to improve relations between the Eastern and Western Churches were notably made by figures such as Pope John Paul II and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I. In the late 20th century, they engaged in dialogue and initiatives aimed at reconciliation, particularly following the historical schism of 1054. Their meetings and joint declarations emphasized mutual respect and the importance of unity among Christians. These efforts continue to influence contemporary ecumenical relations.
Maximos IV has written: 'The Eastern churches and Catholic unity' -- subject- s -: Christian union, Eastern churches
The two churches were the Eastern Orthodox and the Roman Catholic
I don't know if you should put it that way, try this: The Eastern Rite Churches are all part of the Catholic Church.
Mauricio Gordillo has written: 'Compendium theologiae orientalis' -- subject(s): Doctrinal Theology, Doctrines, Eastern churches, Handbooks, manuals, Handbooks, manuals, etc, History, Theology, Theology, Doctrinal 'Theologia Orientalium cum Latinorum comparata' -- subject(s): Catholic Church, Doctrinal Theology, Eastern churches, History, Relations, Theology, Doctrinal
The Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Catholic) churches are the two main branches of Christianity. The Eastern Church is composed of national churches that are in communion with the Patriarch of Constantinople, while the Western Church is under the jurisdiction of the Pope in Rome. The two churches have different theological traditions and practices. The main differences between the Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Catholic) churches are: -The Eastern Church uses the Byzantine Rite while the Western Church uses the Latin Rite. -The Eastern Church is organized into Patriarchates while the Western Church is organized into Dioceses. -The Eastern Church teaches that the Bishop of Rome is the first among equals while the Western Church teaches that the Bishop of Rome is the supreme Pontiff. -The Eastern Church is composed of national churches while the Western Church is composed of local churches 678217.
The Russian Orthodox, Serbian Orthodox, and Carpatho-Russian churches
A:On the European mainland, it was largely Charlemagne who converted the Saxon tribes. Kathleen Jefferts Schori, presiding bishop of the U.S. Episcopal Church, said, "Charlemagne converted whole tribes by the sword." In the year 782, the Frankish king Charlemagne reputedly beheaded forty-five hundred Saxons who resisted his campaign of forced conversion to Christianity. In 800, the Pope rewarded Charlemagne in Rome, crowning him as Holy Roman Emperor.
he spread education and religion throughout the eastern area! duhh
uniate
Uniate