because
Some people supported trusts because they believed that trusts could lead to greater efficiency in industries, lower costs for consumers, and increased economic growth. They saw trusts as a way to centralize control and streamline operations in a competitive marketplace. Additionally, trusts were often backed by wealthy and powerful individuals who could influence government policy in their favor.
some people that don't like cheerleading think that its not a sport and that if guys do it then they are gay. but if people like cheer then they think that it is a sport
President Theodore Roosevelt viewed trusts, or large corporate monopolies, with a mix of skepticism and pragmatism. He believed that while some trusts could promote efficiency and innovation, many were creating unfair competition and exploiting consumers. As a result, he championed the regulation of these trusts through antitrust measures, most notably with the Sherman Antitrust Act, to ensure fair competition and protect the public interest. Roosevelt's approach was to distinguish between "good" trusts that benefited society and "bad" trusts that harmed it.
Because no tow people are the same. Some will be more different than others and some will be labeled as deviant.
May be because, some folks have good heart and trusts anyone easily.
Wealthy entrepreneurs were buying elections and corrupting public officials.
Some people thought the laws brought order and justice to society. They also thought that they regulated many different activities, from business contracts to crime.
"Even in our society, there are many people living in poverty." "Some people feel that society today has no morals." "It can be difficult to find a place in society."
I think what he is trying to say is . Why does everybody get judge on their appearance . It's wrong because some people are poor and some people are rich it doesn't matter .
Of course it is! Ethics (Arguably) vary from person to person. An individual believes what they think to be ethical. Ethics are influenced by society as a whole and as that society differs, so does ethics. We may think it's bad to sacrifice people to god as a means of honouring the person, but some tribe in Mongolia might think differently.
I certainly do not intend to sound mean at a time when you may be dealing with a loved one's death, but the time to deal with this kind of thing really is before the death. At this point you have a few things to deal with. Did the person have any trusts, or a will, or did the person die without any planning? If there is no plan, then Probate Court is pretty much in charge of everything; if you think that you have some interest in the person's property, you should contact them. If there was a will and no trusts, then Probate Court is still in control, but they will probably follow the wishes expressed in the will. If there are trusts, then the people named in the trusts can execute the provisions of the trusts without going through probate. Lesson: Plan ahead, and think things though carefully so that loved ones you leave behind are not left with unintended nightmares.
I think we were always considered people but many people did (and a considerable amount still do) see us as lesser beings because we were different to them or lacked social skills. I think even in an autistic society some will treat typical people as lesser because I know some autistic people (mainly on autistic networks) who can't stand typical people because of cultural differences(although our cultural differences are considered strange because we look like everyone from the culture we were born into)