The Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850 and it was done to satisfy abolitionists who were in Congress. While slavery was outlawed in Washington, D.C. under this compromise, the Fugitive Slave Act allowed slaves to be returned to their masters and those who housed their escape to be punished.
Many U.S northern citizens were against slavery and thought since the North was all free states, that a slave in the north was automatically free. This was not the case. The bounty hunters would arrest the slave and even free African Americans. Despite the controversy, even Abraham Lincoln believed the law was wrong but agreed to enforce it.
To get California admitted to the Union as free soil. This meant offering the South some concessions, like the Fugitive Slave Act (appointing official slave-catchers), which inflamed the Abolitionist lobby and brought it many new recruits.
I believe one of his greatest disappointments are the rise of political parties, which he so greatly disadvised. One of his personal disappointements I believe would be his lack of having any biological children.
It allowed the slave states to count most of it's slaves in order to have more representation by population. The non-slave states discouraged slavery and put in the 3/5ths clause because of it. It was not meant to mean a slave was only 3/5ths of a man as some would have you believe.
Because most Northerners were not Abolitionists. It is true that some disliked the idea of new slave-states on moral grounds. But most were wanting to hold on to the cotton revenues, without allowing the South to extend their influence in Congress (by the admittance of new slave-states) and reduce the taxes on imports, by which the North was able to protect its manufacturing industry.
Many U.S northern citizens were against slavery and thought since the North was all free states, that a slave in the north was automatically free. This was not the case. The bounty hunters would arrest the slave and even free African Americans. Despite the controversy, even Abraham Lincoln believed the law was wrong but agreed to enforce it.
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 made it easier for slave owners to recapture escaped slaves, but it also stirred controversy and resistance in the North. The law did result in the capture and return of some fugitive slaves, but it also heightened tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and contributed to the growing conflict that eventually led to the Civil War.
Some northern states used personal liberty laws to nullify the figitive slave Act, written to help the south.
Fugitive slaves rebelled against the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law by escaping to Canada, forming and joining abolitionist groups, participating in the Underground Railroad, and sometimes physically resisting capture by slave catchers. Some fugitive slaves also sought legal assistance and used the court system to fight for their freedom.
Some northerners defied the Fugitive Slave Act by harboring fugitive slaves, helping them escape to free states or Canada, or participating in the Underground Railroad, a network of safe houses and secret routes for escaping slaves. These individuals believed in the immorality of slavery and chose to actively resist laws that supported it.
Northern Abolitionists did not react favorably to the Fugitive Slave Act. This is because it supported the cause they were against.
1) Please provide a definition of the word "fugitive" it appears misapplied here, 2) Unknown by me, but didn't SDA have some Quaker influence, absolute unknown, 3) What did Abraham Lincon say about the fugitive slave law?
Some Northerners supported personal liberty laws because they opposed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners. By passing personal liberty laws, these Northerners aimed to protect the rights of free African Americans and prevent the capture and return of fugitive slaves in their states.
the southerners believed that article 4, section 2, (Fugitive Slave Act) gave them the right to turn in/retrieve+return fugitive slaves and send them back down to the south. Unfortunately, like some acts, this was taken advantage of. Some southerners would find any colored man/woman, whether they be free and had papers proving so, or they be a fugitive slave, and turn the person(s) in to be sent to a southern plantation where they would be enslaved once again
Personal liberty laws were state laws in the North that provided legal protections for free African Americans and fugitive slaves. These laws directly contradicted the Fugitive Slave Act, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners. The existence of these conflicting laws heightened tensions between the North and South by illustrating the stark differences in the two regions' views on slavery and the rights of individuals.
Passage of Fugitive Slave Act in 1850 meant increased penalties against fugitive slaves and those who aided them. This lead many slaves to leave US territory altogether and seek refuge in Canada to evade US law.
Some people in the North opposed the Fugitive Slave Law because they believed it violated their principles of freedom and morality, as it required them to assist in returning escaped slaves to their owners. Additionally, they felt it strengthened the institution of slavery and went against the growing anti-slavery sentiments in the North.