This is a rather non-describing question. Seeing that throughout the history of man there have been slave holders and slaves in different nations under different sets of rule and sometimes there where revolts and sometimes not.
The main reason however for slave revolts have been oppression of the holder. Slaves are humans seen as property gained often through acts of war. Slaves were not seen as human and often threated worse than animals held by the owner.*
* I'm using past tense because the slave system where there were enough slaves to revolt at any given area is largely taken over by other names for oppression.
fdhtrrrdgzrzdhytrhytdhythyt
they took over ships
A revolt by African slaves in the Caribbean against French colonists.
Slaves who obeyed the wishes of the owner
slaves who obeyed the wishes of the owner
fdhtrrrdgzrzdhytrhytdhythyt
they took over ships
A revolt by African slaves in the Caribbean against French colonists.
many slaves died
Slaves who obeyed the wishes of the owner
slaves who obeyed the wishes of the owner
They wanted slaves to revolt and fight for their freedom.
They killed and hunted down the slaves killing all the ones that would revolt making sure that it would never happen again, is what the southerners thought, but it only sparked more slaves to revolt.
Unfortunately, yes, they were beheaded
A revolt occurs when people take arms against a group of powerful oppressors to change their living conditions.
At the time, the slaves didn't own guns or possess any weaponry of their own, so revolt was nearly impossible. Unless the slave robbed someone with weaponry, or stole a kitchen knife from their master's kitchen, the slaves were well under control and revolt was nearly impossible.
The outcome of the slave revolt varied depending on the specific revolt in question. Some revolts were successful in gaining more rights for slaves or even freedom, while others were brutally suppressed by authorities resulting in many deaths and harsher conditions for remaining slaves.