The southern economy was dependent on agriculture. The plantation owners used slaves to get the work done more quickly and because they didn't have to pay slaves because they are slaves. It did decline somewhat because cotton(the main staple product in the south) has seeds but picking them by hand was too slow and then the cotton would lose its value. Then slavery increased because an inventor named Eli Whitney made the cotton gin, a machine used to pick cotton seeds. Eli Whitney hoped his machine would help slavery decline but the opposite had happened. Since the cotton could have the seeds picked faster they needed more people to plant and harvest the cotton A.K.A. slaves.
Slavery spread in the South due to the economic dependence on plantation agriculture, particularly for crops like cotton. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 made cotton production more profitable, increasing the demand for slave labor. Additionally, social and cultural attitudes in the southern states supported the institution of slavery, leading to its persistence rather than fading away.
What isn't negative about slavery? It's a system of opresing people and taking away their natural and givin rights and will.
Some methods used by females to resist slavery include running away, feigning illness or pregnancy to avoid work, organizing and participating in slave revolts, and forming networks of mutual support with other enslaved women. These actions allowed them to assert some control over their own lives and resist the conditions of slavery.
Slavery was prevalent in the Philippines during the Spanish colonial period, but it was officially abolished in 1863. However, elements of forced labor and human trafficking continue to be issues in the country today, with modern-day slavery often linked to poverty, trafficking, and exploitation. Various laws and initiatives are in place to combat these practices and protect vulnerable populations.
I wonder when you think slavery began. It's been around for hundreds of years in different countries. It's mentioned in the Bible. But you may only be thinking of the slaves in the US. If that's the case, then those slaves most came from west Africa, which is where they lived with their families like normal human beings, until slave traders kidapped them and took them away by boat to be sold to slave owners.
Slavery became popular due to economic motivations, as slave labor was seen as a cheap and efficient way to build wealth through agriculture, mining, and other industries. Additionally, the belief in racial superiority and the dehumanization of enslaved individuals justified the practice in societies that relied on it. These factors combined to perpetuate the widespread acceptance and growth of slavery in various cultures throughout history.
Slavery.
Most citizens of the American West were relatively ambivalent about the issue, but since much of the West was too far North to have massive cotton plantations, the West did not have many slaves. As a result, they did not fight to prevent anti-slavery or pro-slavery laws and typically served as a mediating influence between the North and the South.
The south wanted to do this because they liked slavery and the union didn't. The south then decided to brake away from the north.
Probably to get away from slavery, as there was lots of black slaves in the south.
Slavery during the Civil War in the United States was prominent in the Southern. The Confederate states in the South were in favor of slavery while the Union states in the North were opposed to slavery.
Because the south's belief/outlook on slavery clashed with the belief/outlook of the north.
they didn't want to do away with slavery Lincons on mouth in one of his speaches said that if he could bring the South back into the union he would not do away with salavery
It was a method that slaves in the south used to escape slavery. They went house to house in the night and slowly and secretly moved up to the north and away from slavery.
because the news had to spread round to every master and slave so then slaves started to run away
the union (north)was against slavery and wanted to keep the union while the Confederacy (south) was pro slavery and wanted to brake away from the union
The north and the south. The north was against slavery, and the south was for it.
The Southern states fought to expand slavery. Although only 1/4th of the southern whites owned slaves, the ones that did derived a lot of power from their labor and thus were the major political power in the south. The southern states' succession speeches are all consumed in the issue of slavery. Most don't even mention any other topic other than slavery and the ones that do only mention it in regards to slavery or the desire to spread slavery into U.S. territorial land. The North, on the other hand, is more complicated. Although there were certainly full on abolitionist who full-heartedly believed in the abolishment of slavery, most Northern whites probably did not fight to end slavery at first. Many may not have really liked blacks and some thought that slavery "kept blacks in their place." However, the northern people saw the southern slave owners as wanting an aristocratic caste power structure that the southern slave owners perpetuated in the south. This didn't sit well with the average northerner and the fact that the southern slave owners refused to accept a president legally elected by a majority vote only served to support the notion that the South wanted an oligarchy ruled by a minority elite class rather than the democratic-republic of the "Union" where each [white] man was equal. The taking away of slaves from the Confederate states was more of a punishment of the southern social and political elites by taking away their source of power (the slaves) rather than a rejection of slavery because Union slave states like Kentucky were allowed to keep their slaves until the 13th and 14th amendments were passed.