If you follow the time line of American development you will observe that the United States expanded from New England westward. The south, while sovereign United States territory was culturally, more European than American.
Most plantation owner's were first or second generation Europeans mostly from France, Spain and Italy. They were not connected to the United States other than their geopolitical location. There funding and profits were directly associated with the country they emigrated from.
America attracted more plantations than other European colonies did due to it's political stability. It was a more stable investment. It is also worthwhile to note the slave trade was dominated by Spain and that Spain and France supported the confederate military efforts via direct military support, financial means, and weapons supply.
The south was based off of farming. They had a small scale of land and a low population. They wanted to reach new territories to help promote slavery and farming.
The south was against slavery.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
In Greek and Roman times.
yes slavery was good for the south
The south was based off of farming. They had a small scale of land and a low population. They wanted to reach new territories to help promote slavery and farming.
Geographic conditions in the South encouraged the development of large plantations.
Texas voted to have slavery. Kansas and Nebraska were divided in their decision for and against slavery. South also wanted to expand to California and north was adamant against it.
to expand slavery
The south was against slavery.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
it caused slavery to expand in to the north.
In Greek and Roman times.
yes slavery was good for the south
The South favoured slavery
They did not want slavery in the south they wanted to be apart of slavery.
The Confederacy did not want to abolish slavery. In fact, they wanted to expand slavery into the new territories of the US.