because southern slaves are stupid
Slave holders were considered the highest of the social class. The only way to achieve upward mobility was to own more slaves.
because they pooed
The North supported abolition and tended to look down on slave holders. On the other hand, the South needed the slaves in order to maintain their high standards of living. Without slaves the large property owners in the South would begin to fail.
It was a precursor to the Civil War. Southern slave holders saw that northern abolitionists were willing to resort to violence to end slavery. This in turn caused them to want to secede out of fear.
Southern slave holders used arguments based on white supremacy and the belief that Black people were inferior and needed to be controlled by whites. They argued that slavery was necessary for the economy and that they were providing a "civilizing" influence on enslaved individuals.
Southern states and slave holders.
The Underground Railroad
He would not have to return them to slave holders in the south
Stowe portrays slave holders as cruel, hypocritical, and selfish in this scene. She emphasizes their lack of empathy and disregard for the humanity of the enslaved individuals under their control. Through their actions and words, Stowe highlights the inherent injustice and immorality of slavery.
because southern slaves are stupid
The Southern slave holders profited form Rober B Toneys Decisions. He made it possible for southern slave holders to take their slaves off of foreign land because they were the slave onwners property. This was done through the Dred Scott case.
Southern plantation holders were appalled at the idea that that slavery would be banned in the US territories. They realized that as the territories became States and continued their anti slavery positions, the South would became an even smaller group of slave holding States. In turn, this could lead to the abolition of slavery nationwide. They were correct in this assumption. Most Americans were against slavery. In the days of antebellum, their Congressional response was the passing of the Missouri Compromises.
One argument used by southern slave holders to justify slavery was the belief that African Americans were inferior and needed to be controlled and guided by whites for their own good. They also argued that slavery was essential for the economic prosperity of the southern states, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations.
Slave holders wanted poor whites to view slavery as necessary for the economy and society in order to prevent them from organizing against the institution of slavery. By instilling a sense of superiority in poor whites over enslaved individuals, slave holders sought to maintain social order and divide potential sources of resistance. Additionally, by convincing poor whites that their own livelihoods were tied to the existence of slavery, slave holders aimed to ensure their continued support for the system.
Testimonials of enslaved people were strong weapons because there was often a tendency for slave holders and those sympathetic to them to invoke images of kindly paternalistic slave owners who enslaved these people for their own good and treated them like the irresponsible, rather simple-minded children they were. In actuality, slavery was much worse and someone who had actually been a slave was a powerful witness for the movement.
Slave holders were considered the highest of the social class. The only way to achieve upward mobility was to own more slaves.