They didn't. Africans were often kidnapped by colonists to be slaves in America.
That statement is not correct. Do your homework. Some were kidnapped and not by colonist, but slave traders. Others were sold by their own people. They either owed a debt, were captives of war, criminals, or had charges made up to make them look like criminals, to be sold off for a profit.
People could become slaves in Africa through various ways, such as being captured in warfare, as a form of punishment for crimes, or through being sold by their own communities due to debt or other reasons. Additionally, some individuals became slaves through kidnapping or as a result of being born into slave families.
slaves could inherit their masters property. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not sure about the veracity of the above:- In Africa and indeed across Europe in ancient times slaves were taken as part of conquest when one people attacked another and the ethnicity of the slaves (and masters) was varied. Anyone from any race could be a slave and anyone from any race could be a master. In America all slaves were black Africans and slavery became a racial issue - to justify (in their own minds) what they were doing the white slavers needed to regard the people they had enslaved as inherently inferior humans (because it would be wrong to enslave someone who was equal). This is what made the transatlantic slave trade different.
"Okonkwo was clearly cut out for great things. Achebe highlights Okonkwo’s ambition and drive to succeed, mirroring Africa’s own potential for greatness." "In Okonkwo's story, we see the struggle between tradition and change, much like Africa's own struggle to balance its rich history with modernization." "Okonkwo's tragic flaw, his fear of failure, resonates with Africa's own historical struggles with colonization and loss of identity."
Slaves owned by Africans were sometimes given more rights, better treatment, and opportunities for integration into society, such as the possibility of marrying into the owner's family or achieving freedom. In comparison, slaves owned by Europeans were often subjected to harsher conditions, faced higher levels of brutality, and had limited chances for social mobility or freedom.
Well they didn't usually. People taken for the slave trade were from unorganized tribal villages on the African coast, easy pickings for slave traders. The people were simply forcibly abducted, then taken to market overseas to be sold. Although, now I'm wondering why after a couple of years of this the people just didn't move inland! Maybe they did...
They sold their own people for slavery.
Slaves from Africa.
In Africa, some blacks did, and do in the present day, own slaves. In the United States of America I doubt if any black people held other black people as slaves.
The slaves were often prisoners from the interior of Africa, not their own people (apex)
why did people own slaves
Yes, in Africa
primarily because the institution had existed for about 5,000 years in Africa and elsewhere and had spread to the new world.
In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were not.
They didn't. They abolished it, meaning they stopped it and made it illegal, pretty much.
Slave trade was when people would buy slaves and have them work on their lands.
The rulers of Africa sold their own people into slavery because for some of the rulers, the money they got was more important that the people. By selling people into slavery they could also reduce the number of people they had to care for and increase the resources available to care for those that remained.
masters