In isothermal the temperature is constant whereas in adiabatic the temperature falls or rises rapidly.Consider the case for expansion where in adiabatic the temperature drops. If you consider PV/T=constant then for same pressure we can show that as temp decreases the volume also decreases. During expansion for isothermal the temp does not change so volume is higher than adiabatic.
Example:
Isothermal P=8 Pa, V=x , T=2K
Adiabatic P=8 Pa, V=y, T=1K (as it drops)
Using PV/T=constant we can find that y is less than x.
of the release of latent heat
A less steep slope indicates a slower velocity than that of a steeper slope.
"If the ramp is steeper than the ball will roll faster" can be observed during experiments. "Friction slowed the ball down" and "Gravity caused the ball's motion" are both conjectures (guesses).
We'll generally see an object moving down a steeper slope gain speed more quickly than one moving down a more gradual incline. If you think about this, it makes sense, and it does so in this case because it is correct. A steeper slope makes for a faster acceleration.
Its longer cuz the longer the flatter the incline plane, and on flatter planes, the object presses more than on the shorter ( steeper ones)
Reason being vaguely adiabatic process is more rapid - process is done so fast that no energy is allowed to enter or exit the system. So P-v variations will be high
Flatter lines have a _____ slope than that of steeper lines
When environmental lapse rate is more than dry adiabatic lapse rate, the atmosphere is said to be in
Yes.A mountain is generally steeper than a hill because it is taller.
30% is steeper than 15% slope.
The bed of a youthful valley will be steeper than the remainder of the watercourse, and the valley walls will be steeper than the remainder of the watercourse.
-- Any number less than -5 is a steeper line sloping down. -- Any number greater than +5 is a steeper line sloping up.
no
why some long-run average cost curves are steeper on the downward side than others.
There are two types of adiabatic lapse rates...wet and dry. (wet is also referred to as saturated or moist) To the extent that the cloudiness your question refers to represents saturated air, then no, the wet adiabatic lapse rate would be lower (approximately 1.5C/1000') than the dry adiabatic lapse rate (approximately 3C/1000').
I dont know Sjjajs
less than the wet adiabatic rate.