0
a sharecropper is a laborer who wroks the land for the farmer who owns it, in exchange for a share of the value of the crop.
the landowner was gaining more money than the sharecroppers. if you want this answer for mrs brand, here it is. good luck guys see u in school
Sharecroppers were agricultural workers who rented land from landowners in exchange for a share of the crops they produced. The main difference between sharecroppers and landowners is that sharecroppers did not own the land they cultivated, while landowners were the ones who owned the land and typically provided resources such as tools, seeds, and housing in exchange for a portion of the harvest.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is sharecroppers differ from landowners?
Sharecroppers are tenants who work on land owned by someone else and pay a portion of their crops as rent. Landowners, on the other hand, own the land and may lease or rent it out to sharecroppers or other tenants. Landowners have legal ownership and control over the land, while sharecroppers work the land in exchange for a share of the crops they produce.
What was possibly true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.
Why might the landowners want to keep the sharecroppers indebted to them?
Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.
What is the true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers typically outline the terms of the arrangement, including the division of labor, the sharing of crops, and any compensation for the sharecropper. These contracts can vary widely and are subject to negotiation, but it's important for both parties to clearly understand and agree to the terms to avoid disputes later on. Landowners often provide land and resources, while sharecroppers provide labor and expertise in cultivation.
How is sharecroppers differ from landowners?
Sharecroppers are tenants who work on land owned by someone else and pay a portion of their crops as rent. Landowners, on the other hand, own the land and may lease or rent it out to sharecroppers or other tenants. Landowners have legal ownership and control over the land, while sharecroppers work the land in exchange for a share of the crops they produce.
What was possibly true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.
What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?
Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.
Why did the plan of scharecropping seem to be a good idea for both the landowners and the sharecroppers?
The landowners give the sharecroppers enough money to live on.
Why might the landowners want to keep the sharecroppers indebted to them?
Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.
Why did the plan of sharecropping seem to be a good idea for both the landowners and the sharecroppers?
heath is dumbbbbbbbbbb\
Was probably true about contracts between landowners and Sharecroppers?
The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.
What is the true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers typically outline the terms of the arrangement, including the division of labor, the sharing of crops, and any compensation for the sharecropper. These contracts can vary widely and are subject to negotiation, but it's important for both parties to clearly understand and agree to the terms to avoid disputes later on. Landowners often provide land and resources, while sharecroppers provide labor and expertise in cultivation.
A way the landowners took advantage of sharecropper was by?
Landowners took advantage of sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans needed to buy supplies, tools, or seeds for farming. This often left sharecroppers in a cycle of debt, forcing them to remain on the land in order to repay their debts.
What happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
A f amily farmed a portion of a white landowners land in return for housing a share of the crop?
They would be sharecroppers.
What would happen to sharecroppers who would not pay their debts to landowners?
They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.
