no
The Great Compromise was proposed by the Connecticut representative to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Great Compromise decided that representation in the House would be based on population, whereas each state would have an equal number of senators.
By local vote (or 'Popular Sovereignty') This sounded like a reasonable and peaceful solution, but it led to bloodshed, with terrorists intimidating the voters, and it generally raised the heat of the whole slavery debate.
Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois played a key role in the development of the Compromise of 1850. He introduced the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to determine for themselves whether to allow slavery. Douglas believed this approach would help ease sectional tensions between the North and South. His efforts were instrumental in passing the compromise, although it ultimately failed to provide a lasting solution to the slavery issue in the United States.
Popular sovereignty, which allowed settlers in the Kansas territory to decide whether to allow slavery, failed to resolve the issue because it led to violent conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The influx of people from both sides seeking to influence the vote resulted in widespread fraud and intimidation, undermining the legitimacy of the electoral process. This chaos intensified national tensions over slavery, demonstrating that simply allowing local decision-making could not address the deep moral and political divisions in the country. Ultimately, popular sovereignty exacerbated conflicts rather than providing a viable solution.
Lewis Cass
Lewis Cass
popular sovereignty was an unworkable solution for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska
Hypothesis
Stephen Douglas believed in popular sovereignty, allowing residents of each territory to decide the issue of slavery for themselves through voting. He proposed this as a solution to the slavery issue in the territories, particularly during the debates surrounding the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Kk
no
Hypothosis
a hypothesis is the answer to your question...
An irrelevant reason or a high degree of improbability of a practical application does not make a case for the value of a proposed solution. The value of a proposed solution would be how well it meets the needs of the problem and the ability for it to be implemented.crystal in doggystyle all night drequan
A proposed solution to a math problem involves presenting a method or approach to arrive at the answer. This can include defining variables, applying relevant formulas, or using logical reasoning to solve the problem step by step. It may also involve verifying the solution to ensure its accuracy. Ultimately, the proposed solution should clearly outline how the problem is addressed and demonstrate the final result.
A solution proposed for a problem that is reasonable but untested could be called a "hypothetical solution" or "theoretical solution." Such a solution is based on logical reasoning and existing knowledge but lacks empirical evidence or practical application to validate its effectiveness. It serves as a starting point for further exploration and experimentation.