answersLogoWhite

0

Army surgeon Dr. John Emerson owned Scott. He died before the Dred Scott case was over. His widow appealed the case after his death which ended up in the Supreme Court which decided the Scott should not be freed.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
More answers

Dred Scott was owned by a U.S. Army surgeon named Dr. John Emerson. After Emerson's death, Scott's ownership transferred to Emerson's widow, Irene Sanford, when she inherited his estate.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago
User Avatar

he was dr john Emerson and he was a surgical general in the army

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who was dred scotts owner?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Who sued for his freedom after moving to Missouri with his owner?

Dred Scott sued for his freedom after moving to Missouri with his owner. The case, Dred Scott v. Sandford, reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857 and resulted in a decision that further entrenched slavery in the United States.


Who was a slave who sued his owner for freedom?

Dred Scott was a slave who sued his owner for freedom in the United States in the 1850s. The case, Dred Scott v. Sandford, reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled against Scott, stating that slaves were property and not citizens, thereby denying his freedom.


Who is a slave who sued for his freedom after being taken into free territory by owner?

Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom after being taken by his owner to free territories. The landmark Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ruled that even though Scott was in a free territory, he was not entitled to freedom because he was property under the law.


What reasons did Taney give for Dred scotts status as an unslaved person?

Chief Justice Taney argued that Dred Scott did not have the legal standing to sue for his freedom because African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered US citizens under the Constitution. Taney also maintained that as a slave, Scott was viewed as property rather than a person with rights.


Why was the dred Scott case brought to Supreme Court?

The Dred Scott case was brought to the Supreme Court to resolve the legal status of Dred Scott, an enslaved man who claimed his freedom because he had lived in free territories with his owner. The case raised questions about slavery in the United States and whether enslaved individuals could be considered citizens with legal rights.