In 1858, it was evident that Lincoln opposed slavery. He said as much in his debates against Stephen Douglas, who was his opponent in the presidential race.
Yes - because it declared slavery to be legal in every state of the Union. That was the essence of the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858.
For the most part, the five Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858 centered around the issue of slavery. Lincoln, who although was well known in Illinois, gained national attention as Douglas was a famous politician with a national reputation. Newspaper coverage was extensive.
Abraham Lincoln was the Republican. He ran against Stephen Douglas, a Democrat in 1858. Douglas won.
1856~1858
American Infidelity was created in 1858.
That's what the debates were about - was slavery protected by the Constitution? If so, how could the new states vote to be free soil?
Stephen Douglas
In 1858, Abraham Lincoln was the Republican Party's nominee for the Illinois senate seat occupied by nationally known Senator Stephen A. Douglas. Lincoln's position on slavery was that it was wrong. Knowing that slavery was strongly supported in the southern states where it existed, Lincoln was among the many people in the US, who believed that slavery should not be extended to the US Western territories.
Yes, slavery was permitted in the territory of Minnesota between 1849 and 1858. However, the state officially entered the Union in 1858 as a free state, meaning slavery was no longer allowed.
Stephen A.Douglas in 1858,
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were the two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858.
For the most part the Lincoln and Douglas debates centered around slavery. Lincoln made it clear how strong his opposition to slavery was. Douglas was not a pro-slavery advocate, but trusted the US Supreme Court decision in 1858 that basically declared slavery legal.
Abraham Lincoln.
Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln were opponents in the race for United States Senator from Illinois in 1858. They engaged in seven debates during the campaign, focused on the gripping national question of the day, slavery: whether it should be ended entirely, or limited to certain states only, or allowed to exist in whichever states wanted it, and various positions in between. Douglas was in favor of "popular sovereignty", allowing each new state to decide for itself to whether or not to allow slavery. Lincoln was against the spread of slavery, though he also said that "a house divided against itself could not stand." Douglas was favored in the 1858 Senate election - he held the position already, had had national impact as a Senator, and was a much more experienced and polished politician than Lincoln - and won as expected. Douglas was also trying in the 1858 election campaign to position himself to win the Presidential election in 1860. He thought that his reasonable compromise position - neither abolishing slavery nor allowing it in territories in which a majority was against slavery, but permitting it where it was wanted - could appeal to everyone. Instead, however, because feelings on both sides of the issue were so strong, he alienated Northerners who favored abolition of slavery entirely or at least any spread of slavery, and also strongly pro-slavery Southerners, who did not believe that new states should be allowed to prohibit slavery.
Even though Lincoln did not approve of slavery throughout his life, he realized it would be improbable that blacks and whites could live with equality, since they had to deal with too many prejudices. During the Lincoln-Douglas debate at Charleston on September 18, 1858, Lincoln stated: "I will say then that I am not, nor have I ever been in the favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races . . . There must be a position of superior and inferior, and I... am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race ... I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position that the negroe should be deprived everything." It must be remembered also that an abolitionist could not have been elected president.
No, it outlawed slavery in its 1777 Constittution and again by State Law in 1858.
abolition of slavery