answersLogoWhite

0

to relax and have fun

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
More answers

A slave driver was responsible for overseeing and supervising enslaved individuals on plantations or other work settings. Their duties included enforcing discipline, assigning tasks, ensuring productivity, and often using physical force or punishment to maintain control over the enslaved population.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the duties of a slave driver?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

How did a planter decide if a slave had been seasoned?

A planter would typically evaluate if a slave had been "seasoned" by observing their ability to adapt to the demands of plantation work, such as long hours in harsh conditions, and their understanding of the plantation's routines and rules. Seasoned slaves were considered experienced and capable of performing their duties effectively.


What are Kant's perfect duties and how do they differ from imperfect duties?

Kant's perfect duties are actions that must always be done, such as telling the truth or keeping promises. Imperfect duties are actions that should be done but are not always required, such as helping others in need. The main difference is that perfect duties are strict and universal, while imperfect duties allow for some flexibility in when and how they are fulfilled.


What are Kant's views on imperfect duties and how do they differ from perfect duties?

Kant believed that imperfect duties are those that we have the freedom to choose when and how to fulfill, such as helping others or self-improvement. In contrast, perfect duties are those that we must always fulfill, such as telling the truth or keeping promises. Imperfect duties allow for personal discretion, while perfect duties are absolute and non-negotiable.


What is Kant's perspective on imperfect duties and how do they differ from perfect duties?

Kant believed that imperfect duties are those that we have the freedom to choose when and how to fulfill, such as helping others in need. In contrast, perfect duties are those that we must always fulfill, such as telling the truth. Imperfect duties allow for more flexibility and personal judgment, while perfect duties are strict and non-negotiable.


What is the distinction between perfect duties and imperfect duties in ethics?

Perfect duties in ethics are those that are considered to be universally binding and must always be followed, such as the duty not to lie or steal. Imperfect duties, on the other hand, are duties that are important but not always specific in their application, such as the duty to help others in need.