0
What else can I help you with?
In debates leading up the the Three-fifths Compromise southern states argued that?
Slaves should be counted when counting a state’s population to determine representation in congress
How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention deal with slavery?
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
How did the southern states want slaves to be counted and determining representation in the house and why?
Southern states wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population for determining representation in the House of Representatives. They argued that since slaves constituted a significant portion of their population, counting them would increase their political power and influence in Congress. This demand was rooted in the desire to maintain and protect the institution of slavery, as greater representation would help secure their interests. Consequently, the Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, allowing slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for this purpose.
This compromise proposed the method to count a states population by counting the free citizens and a fraction of all others?
The three-fifths compromise was proposed as a way of counting slaves for the purpose of representation in the House. The northerners didn't want them to get more representatives because of so many non-voting people.
What did Gunning Bedford Jr think about slaves counting in the states population number?
Gunning Bedford Jr. thought that slaves should not count in the state population because he was against the act of slavery. After the Constitutional Convention, he used his position as the Federal District Judge of Delaware to abolish slavery.
What states had the least to gain from counting slaves in the population for purposes of representation?
Massachusetts
How did William Paterson feel about counting slaves as part of the population?
William Paterson believed that counting slaves as part of the population would give more political power to states with larger slave populations, potentially increasing their representation in government. He opposed such a practice and advocated for counting slaves as three-fifths of a person in determining representation in Congress, as outlined in the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention.
Why did the southern states want to count slaves as part of their populations?
Southern states wanted to count slaves as part of their populations for the purpose of representation in the United States Congress. By counting slaves as part of the population, southern states could increase their representation in Congress, despite slaves not having the right to vote.
What was the debate between north south over counting slave population?
The three-fifths clause provided for counting three-fifths of all slaves for purposes of representation in Congress.
In debates leading up the the Three-fifths Compromise southern states argued that?
Slaves should be counted when counting a state’s population to determine representation in congress
The compromise between the north and south states over counting the slaves was called?
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
What was the northern states viewpoint on counting slaves for the purpose of representation in Congress?
Northern states opposed it, Southern States were in favor. Finally they compromised, and agreed that 5 slaves would be counted as 3 citizens.
How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention deal with slavery?
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
Should slaves be counted in the population?
The issue of counting slaves in the population is complex and has historical implications. In terms of representation, counting slaves would have given slaveholding states more political power in early American history. However, excluding slaves would have misrepresented the true population size. Ultimately, the decision to count slaves as part of the population was a compromise reached during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
In debates leading up to the three fifths compromise, Northern states argued that?
Slaves should not be included when counting a states population to determine representation in congress. (APEX)
What was norths goals during the civil war?
to free all slaves from slavry in the south
How did the southern states want slaves to be counted and determining representation in the house and why?
Southern states wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population for determining representation in the House of Representatives. They argued that since slaves constituted a significant portion of their population, counting them would increase their political power and influence in Congress. This demand was rooted in the desire to maintain and protect the institution of slavery, as greater representation would help secure their interests. Consequently, the Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, allowing slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for this purpose.
