yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.
The rich people had ornate and large homes. The poor had what they could afford. As more land became enclosed for raising sheep for wool, more people became poor and lost their homes. People were sometimes forced into workhouses.
For the rich: Anything that isn't fast food now. For the poor: Anything that is.
The answer is quiet simple if you think about it in the colonial times,there were slaves and taxes and jobs that needed to be payed or finished.the rich had enough money to pay for the taxes while the poor could not.the rich had slaves do the chores around the house,in the fields.The poor has to do everything all by themselves.The answer is quiet simple if you think about it in the colonial times,there were slaves and taxes and jobs that needed to be payed or finished.the rich had enough money to pay for the taxes while the poor could not.the rich had slaves do the chores around the house,in the fields.The poor has to do everything all by themselves.
they wore different clothes
No. There was a real difference, just like today.
the poor where misteated by the rich because the rich always looked down on poor people:)
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
You may not have a grasp on the terms rich and poor, and the difference between them.
rich poor have food don't have food can play have a job
she was rich and poor at times
Hmmm. That's a toughy. Maybe the rich were richer than the poor
People have always made differences about what poor and rich wore but if poor people ere equal to rich then both wear the same things.
poor
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
A tailor in colonial times was neither rich or poor, but lived a modest life. The tailors in that time period were needed by both the rich citizens and the poor.