Serfs worked on the lands of the Lords and most the produce belonged to the Lords. Tenant farmers, on the other hand, work on the lands of the Lords but keep all the produce, and just pay rent.
Chat with our AI personalities
Serfs were bound to the land they worked on and had limited freedom, often owed labor or services to the landowner, while tenant farmers rented land and paid rent in exchange for the use of the land to cultivate crops or raise livestock. Serfs were tied to the land for generations, whereas tenant farmers had more flexibility and could move to different land or properties.
A freeman was a person who was not bound to the land or obligated to provide labor to a lord, while a serf was a person who was bound to the land and required to provide labor to a lord in exchange for protection. Freemen had more freedom and autonomy compared to serfs who had limited rights and mobility.
Lords were wealthy landowners who granted land to knights in exchange for military service and loyalty. Knights, in turn, provided protection to the lord and his lands, as well as overseeing the serfs who worked the land. Serfs were peasants who worked the land and were bound to it, owing labor and produce to the lord in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land.
False. Serfs were legally bound to a certain piece of land and obligated to work for the lord who owned that land, but they were not considered slaves as they were not owned by the lord and did have some legal rights and protections.
Knights were responsible for protecting the serfs and the land they lived on from invading forces. They also collected taxes and ensured order and justice within their domain. Additionally, knights may have provided some basic services and resources to the serfs in exchange for their labor on the land.
Serfs were not allowed to leave the manor without permission from their lord, marry without their lord's approval, or pursue a different occupation than the one assigned to them.