answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

They felt they had a moral obligation to make change.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

The Transcendentalists generally opposed social issues such as slavery, viewing it as a violation of individual rights and freedoms. They believed in equality and the importance of moral principles in social reform. Many Transcendentalists were actively involved in abolitionist movements.

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What was the Transcendentalists' general attitude toward slavery?

That it was wrong and they had an obligation to change it


What was the transcendentalist genral attitude toward slavery?

Transcendentalists generally believed that slavery was morally wrong and went against their principles of individualism, self-reliance, and equality. They advocated for the abolition of slavery and believed that all individuals, regardless of race, should have equal rights and opportunities. Some transcendentalists, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, actively participated in the abolitionist movement.


What was the Greek's attitude toward slavery?

In ancient Greece, slavery was accepted as a normal part of society. Slaves were considered property and had no rights, but their treatment varied depending on their individual owners. Some Greeks believed that slavery was a necessary institution to maintain their way of life.


What was the Quakers attitude towards slavery?

The Quakers were one of the first religious groups to actively oppose slavery. They believed in the equality of all people and were leaders in the abolitionist movement. Quakers denounced slavery as immoral and worked towards its abolition through various means, such as organizing protests, aiding escaped slaves, and lobbying for legal change.


How did Henry Highland Garnet's attitude toward slavery differ from that of William Lloyd Garrison?

Henry Highland Garnet believed in more aggressive tactics to end slavery, advocating for armed resistance and violent uprising. William Lloyd Garrison, on the other hand, was a pacifist who believed in nonviolent resistance and moral persuasion to end slavery.

Related questions

What was the Transcendentalists' general attitude toward slavery?

That it was wrong and they had an obligation to change it


What was Lincoln's attitude about slavery in the states?

Lincoln was against slavery.


What was the Greek's attitude toward slavery?

In ancient Greece, slavery was accepted as a normal part of society. Slaves were considered property and had no rights, but their treatment varied depending on their individual owners. Some Greeks believed that slavery was a necessary institution to maintain their way of life.


What was the attitude of American toward slavery after the war?

Slavery was outlawed in the US in 1807. Anything after that was considered contraband.


What was Georgia's attitude toward slavery?

Georgia didn't agree


What was the middle colonies attitude towards slavery?

according to my world history book englands attitude towards slavery was really strict in fact some people even were punished depending on their crime


How was slavery in the rhode island colony or attitude towards it?

you tell me i asked you


What is William garrisons attitude toward slavery?

He has a very strong testimony about it.


What was the attitude towards slavery in the New England?

In New England, there was a growing opposition to slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries. Many individuals and groups in the region began to advocate for the abolition of slavery, influenced by Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality. By the early 19th century, all New England states had abolished slavery or begun the process of gradual emancipation.


What attitude toward slavery does the narrative most strongly convey?

outraged


What problems did the 13th amendment create?

Slavery was not abolished.


What was the attitude towards slavery in the new England colonies?

occoding to my calculations your stupid