0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Coach
Lao
Beau
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How might the Stanford prison experiment have shown in-group bias?
The Stanford prison experiment demonstrated in-group bias by showing how participants assigned the role of guards quickly identified with their group and exhibited prejudice and discrimination towards the "prisoner" group. This bias led to dehumanization and mistreatment of the prisoners, showcasing the power of group dynamics in influencing behavior.
What was the Stanford prison experiment showed that?
The Stanford prison experiment showed how situational factors, such as the role people are assigned, can greatly influence human behavior. It demonstrated the power of social roles and the potential for individuals to exhibit abusive behavior when placed in positions of authority. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of ethical considerations in psychological research.
What research method was used in the Philip Zimbardo's study?
Philip Zimbardo's study, known as the Stanford prison experiment, utilized a quasi-experimental research design. Participants were randomly assigned to role-play as prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment to observe the effects of situational factors on behavior. The study aimed to investigate how individuals conform to assigned social roles and the potential consequences of power dynamics in a controlled setting.
What was Zimbardo's approach to psychology?
Zimbardo's approach to psychology focused on understanding human behavior in social contexts, particularly in relation to conformity, authority, and obedience. He is best known for his Stanford prison experiment, which highlighted the powerful influence of situational factors on human behavior and the need to consider the role of environments in shaping individuals' actions.
What were the negative effects experienced by participants in the Zimbardo prison experiment?
Participants in the Zimbardo prison experiment experienced negative psychological effects such as extreme stress, anxiety, and emotional trauma. The study was terminated early due to concerns about the well-being of the participants. Some participants reported lasting negative impacts on their mental health.
