Criticism is pointing out a flaw in,disagreeing with or disliking the actions/words of something or someone based on opinion,but not determining the person/thing's worth based upon it.
Judgement is claiming that someone or something's worth or reputation is determined by their actions/words/lifestyle or by one relative flaw or asset.
The difference between judgment and constructive criticism is that judgment usually refers to a decision with a punishment involved and constructive criticism means to offer both positive and negative opinions on how something is viewed, but in a friendly way. If you like, a judgement expresses a valuation of something, but constructive criticism goes farther and offers opinions on how it might be improved.
jok
Nothing.
It's the intent behind the criticism/feedback. If it is meant to be constructive or to be hurtful makes a big difference.
Judgement is the process and vedict is the ultimatum.Hence judgment is the second last step to verdict but not always.
An abstract of judgment is a statement written as a summary of a judgment. It generally outlines any money owed by the plaintiff to the defendant or claimant in the case.
Basically, a default judgment is something you did NOT argue about in court by filing answers to the Summons and Complaint, and the Summary Judgment is something you did argue about IN COURT.
well good is holy and mighty
All moral judgements are value judgements but not all value judgements are moral.
assumption is objective and personal judgment is subjective
Check this site out for more information... http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/290910/body_language_vs_written_word.html
Facts can be proven, where as opinions are points of view.