Some states passed personal liberty laws for runaway slaves.
well really southernes wanted slavery while northerners did not want it. :)
Northerners opposed the Fugitive Slacve law because they were against slavery, so they didn't want to help capture runaway slaves because they thought that if they had got away, then leave them alone. Besides it would make slavery worse in a way.
The reason the second federal fugitive slave law made northerners upset was because most northerners thought that slavery was immoral and that they would have to help capture the slaves or be finned is impeachment of there rights.
I'm not very sure what your question is. But pro-slavery men snuck over and burned building of Northerners or non-slavery people. They burned official buildings and murdered 5 people. This was called "Bleeding Kansas."
Slaves had better lives than many free factory
Most Northerner didn't care for slavery. That is not to say they didn't want it abolished, it just did not affect their life.
Some states passed personal liberty laws for runaway slaves.
they were wiling to accept it where it already existed but opposed further expansion
Northerners and Southerners were not ready to resort to violence to abolish slavery
Some northerners believed slavery was morally wrong. Southerners believed slavery was an essential part of their lives.
Northerners were completely against slavery, and before the Civil War they took their hatred overboard by killing Southerners for their slavery.
no.
Many Northerners were for the proclamation that ended slavery. However, there were Northerners who felt like Southerners and opposed it.
Federalists
many northerners learned about slavery by personal contact with slaves.
The northerners felt slavery was bad, although they bought cotton from the south that the slaves made. The southerners felt slavery was very useful to make and sell goods.
The southerners wanted slavery to end but northerners didn't want that