Whichever radius you are referring to depends on yield.
The impact of the weakest nuclear weapon on a target is generally less destructive compared to more powerful nuclear weapons. Weaker nuclear weapons have a smaller blast radius and lower levels of radiation, resulting in less damage and casualties. However, any nuclear weapon has the potential to cause significant devastation and loss of life.
That depends on what you're referring to: The fireball radius (the nuclear explosion itself), the total anhiliation range radius, and etc. For example, the bomb launched on Hiroshima had a fireball of several hundred feet in radius, a 1km total destruction range radius, and severe damage for miles. For firepower bombs (nuclear bombs made for power show & not effectiveness) The Tsar bomba of USSR had 50~55 megatons of TNT firepower, a fireball with 1km+ radius, total destruction for miles, and created a sound shockwave that could be heard in Norway/Other far Northern European areas. Modern nuclear weapons don't have a single blast radius; the U.S. developed M.I.R.V.s (cluster nuclear bombs) that spread apart to create a shotgun blast of multiple nuclear explosions.
When a nuclear weapon is used, it releases an enormous amount of energy in the form of a blast wave, intense heat, and radiation. This can cause widespread destruction, including buildings being leveled, fires spreading rapidly, and severe injuries or death to individuals within the blast radius. The long-term effects can include radiation sickness, long-lasting environmental damage, and the potential for nuclear fallout.
Nuclear weapons cause immense destruction by unleashing intense heat, blast, and radiation. They can level buildings, create widespread fires, and cause long-term health effects for those exposed to radiation. The impact of a nuclear explosion can extend far beyond the immediate blast radius, affecting communities and ecosystems for years to come.
The explosion radius of a nuclear bomb can vary depending on its size and design, but a typical range for a strategic nuclear weapon is a blast radius of several miles and a thermal radiation radius of several more miles. The effects of the blast, heat, and radiation can cause widespread destruction and casualties over a large area.
The impact of the weakest nuclear weapon on a target is generally less destructive compared to more powerful nuclear weapons. Weaker nuclear weapons have a smaller blast radius and lower levels of radiation, resulting in less damage and casualties. However, any nuclear weapon has the potential to cause significant devastation and loss of life.
That depends on what you're referring to: The fireball radius (the nuclear explosion itself), the total anhiliation range radius, and etc. For example, the bomb launched on Hiroshima had a fireball of several hundred feet in radius, a 1km total destruction range radius, and severe damage for miles. For firepower bombs (nuclear bombs made for power show & not effectiveness) The Tsar bomba of USSR had 50~55 megatons of TNT firepower, a fireball with 1km+ radius, total destruction for miles, and created a sound shockwave that could be heard in Norway/Other far Northern European areas. Modern nuclear weapons don't have a single blast radius; the U.S. developed M.I.R.V.s (cluster nuclear bombs) that spread apart to create a shotgun blast of multiple nuclear explosions.
When a nuclear weapon is used, it releases an enormous amount of energy in the form of a blast wave, intense heat, and radiation. This can cause widespread destruction, including buildings being leveled, fires spreading rapidly, and severe injuries or death to individuals within the blast radius. The long-term effects can include radiation sickness, long-lasting environmental damage, and the potential for nuclear fallout.
The nuclear radius generally increases with increasing atomic mass number due to the increased number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. This leads to stronger nuclear forces that push the nucleons farther apart, resulting in a larger nuclear radius. However, there are exceptions and fluctuations in nuclear size due to specific nuclear properties and shell effects.
The radius of radiation from a nuclear reactor can vary depending on factors such as the reactor's power output, type of nuclear fuel used, and containment measures in place. Generally, an exclusion zone of several kilometers is established around a nuclear reactor to protect the public from potential radiation exposure.
Nuclear weapons cause immense destruction by unleashing intense heat, blast, and radiation. They can level buildings, create widespread fires, and cause long-term health effects for those exposed to radiation. The impact of a nuclear explosion can extend far beyond the immediate blast radius, affecting communities and ecosystems for years to come.
The explosion radius of a nuclear bomb can vary depending on its size and design, but a typical range for a strategic nuclear weapon is a blast radius of several miles and a thermal radiation radius of several more miles. The effects of the blast, heat, and radiation can cause widespread destruction and casualties over a large area.
No, a nuclear explosion on a nuclear power plant would not cause the explosion radius to increase. The explosion radius would be determined by the yield of the nuclear weapon itself, not by the presence of the power plant.
Assuming that your question pertains to the explosive force of a nuclear weapon, very. The largest nuke ever built, the Russian Czar Bomb, had a force equivalent to 50 million tons of TNT detonating. This bomb was so large it could give severe burns to all of west Germany!
Increasing positive nuclear charge
I don't know what radius you want, but whichever one it depends on yield.
The smaller atomic radius of a magnesium atom compared to a sodium atom is primarily a result of the increased nuclear charge in magnesium due to the higher number of protons. This increased nuclear charge pulls the electrons closer to the nucleus, resulting in a smaller atomic radius for magnesium.