answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

arthoplasty is a proceadure of hip replacement meanwhile ORIF is fixing a fracture with intramedullary rod or plates and screws.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is a surgical technique used to put fractured bones back into place and secure them with internal hardware like plates and screws, while arthroplasty is a surgical procedure to replace a joint with a prosthesis. ORIF is typically used for bone fractures, while arthroplasty is used for severe joint damage or degenerative conditions like Arthritis.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the different between an open reduction internal fixation and Arthroplasty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

What caused many of the moai at Easter Island to be destroyed?

Many moai statues on Easter Island were knocked over during internal conflicts between different tribes. However, the main reason for their destruction was the effects of European contact, such as disease, colonization, and slave raiding, which led to societal collapse and the toppling of many moai.


What do you think Egyptians learned about the human body by embalming?

Egyptians learned about human anatomy, preservation techniques, and the effects of different substances on the body through the process of embalming. They gained knowledge on how to protect and prepare the body for the afterlife, as well as valuable insights into internal organs and bodily functions. Additionally, embalming practices fueled advancements in medicine and surgery in ancient Egypt.


Why might the Olmec or Zapotec civilization might have declined?

The decline of the Olmec civilization around 400 BCE is believed to be due to factors such as climate change, environmental degradation, and possibly internal conflict. The decline of the Zapotec civilization around 900 CE can be attributed to a combination of reasons including environmental factors, internal unrest, and possibly invasion by neighboring groups.


How were the explorations of Francisco Pizarro and Fernando Cortes similar and different?

Both Francisco Pizarro and Fernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led expeditions to conquer indigenous civilizations in the Americas, but their conquests occurred in different regions. Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America (Peru), while Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Central America (Mexico). Additionally, their methods of conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and exploiting internal Inca divisions, while Cortes utilized a combination of military force, diplomacy, and alliances with indigenous groups to defeat the Aztecs.


What is one way that historians can establish the authenticity of a primary source?

By analyzing internal consistency within the source itself, such as language, writing style, and content. This can help determine if the source is likely to be from the claimed time period and author.