There is no such distinction in the natural sciences.
All natural science operates by formulating testable hypotheses and then testing those hypotheses against observation. It does not matter whether the hypothesis concerns something that is too far away, too far past, too little or too large to observe directly: the methodology remains exactly the same in all cases.
Operational science addresses only things that are able to be duplicated and observed in the present.
There are allot of difference but the main difference is the science is discovered while the literature is invented
All science is knowledge but not all knowledge is science.
Engineer and Scientist
nothing.
Time isn't different. The difference between science fiction and other fiction is the use of scientific knowledge that we don't have at the present. Steam punk is science fiction set in historical eras.
There is no difference.
Operational science addresses only things that are able to be duplicated and observed in the present.
jgjkkgjkg
There are allot of difference but the main difference is the science is discovered while the literature is invented
I don't see a difference really. the future will always involve science
All science is knowledge but not all knowledge is science.
Engineer and Scientist
nothing.
== ==
yes physics is the study of the universe and science is science
the difference between them are technology is to do with computers and electric things while science is to do with experiments.