0
What is the difference between innocent misrepresentation and fraudulent misrepresentation?
the difference between fraudulent miisrepresentation and innocent misrepresentation is that innocent representation is when a statement is made with a genuine belief that it is true while fraudulent misrepresentation is a statement that is made with the knowledge that it is untrue or misleading.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Vivi
BeauAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between bogus and fraudulent and how to use them?
The main difference is that bogus is informal, best used in conversation, not in "writing."
What is the difference between the remedy available for fraud and the remedy available for misrepresentation?
Remedy for fraud is criminal while remedy for misrepresentation is of civil nature. Fraud deprives one party and benefit other party while misrepresentation may or may not have an impact on either party.
What is the difference between fraud and misrepresentation in legal terms?
Fraud is a deliberate act of deception with the intent to deceive, while misrepresentation is a false statement made without the intent to deceive. Both involve providing false information, but fraud involves intentional deceit, whereas misrepresentation may be unintentional.
What is the difference between fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets?
One is really fraud where the other in not correctly stated.
What is the difference between misrepresentation and fraud in terms of legal implications and consequences?
Misrepresentation refers to a false statement made innocently or without intent to deceive, while fraud involves a deliberate and intentional deception. In legal terms, misrepresentation may result in contract rescission or damages, while fraud can lead to criminal charges and more severe penalties.
What is the difference between misrepresentation of facts and misinterpretation of facts?
Misrepresentation of facts involves intentionally providing false information, while misinterpretation of facts involves misunderstanding or incorrectly explaining accurate information. Misrepresentation is deliberate deception, while misinterpretation is often unintentional and may result from a lack of understanding or context.
Difference between fraud and misrepresentation?
Difference between fraud and Misinterpretation1. Fraud is always done Intentionally, Misinterpretation can be preformed Intentionally or Negligently.2. Fraud always have malicious intent, Misinterpretation may not have malicious intent to deceive if it happens negligently through a misstatement and/or omission of a material fact(s)
Why doesnt the judge recognize the difference between innocent people and non-innocent people?
Simply because there is no obvious difference between innocents and guilty. You can have a surly, ugly brute, with a long criminal record who is innocent - at least of that particular crime. Or you can have someone looking like a perfectly trustworthy and honest citizen who've done the most horrible things. You just can't tell. Innocent vs guilty has to be settled by something ELSE. Evidence, witness statements etc. And these can sometimes be wrong, or interpreted wrong.
What is the difference between innocent and not guilty?
Innocent means you are innocent of a crime.. That is you did not commit it. A court (jury/judge) will not find someone "innocent". They can't say that you did not commit a crime, they can only decide for "not guilty" if the evidence presented is enough that you are believed to have committed a crime (guilty) or not (not guilty).
What are opinions of the difference between a scam and scandal?
A scam refers to a fraudulent action to gain profit, a scandal refers to a disreputable action taken to defame, disgrace, or dishonor character or reputation.
Is the most fraudulent for of Christianity Mormonism and can be proven by way of simple math?
There is no correlation between the two.
The major difference between Dante the writer and Dante the character is that the character is more innocent and unassuming. In Canto XXVI of the Inferno Virgil scolds Dante for sitting down and resti?
The evidence does not support the thesis.
