collective rights are for certain specific groups of people, like the Indian Act. Individual rights are meant to protect an Individual and his interests. For example: Right to life.
Their collective rights would be defended at all costs.
In Canada, collective rights for Indigenous peoples are protected under the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982, which includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Additionally, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) provides a framework for the protection of Indigenous collective rights in Canada.
Civil and political rights: relate to individual liberties such as freedom of speech and assembly. Economic, social, and cultural rights: relate to standards of living such as housing and healthcare. Collective rights: relate to rights of groups or communities, like indigenous peoples or minorities.
The difference between statutory and non statutory rights is that one is supplied by the government and the other one isn't. Statutory rights are bestowed by particular government to governed people and are relative to specific cultures and governments
procedural due process focuses on the fairness of the legal process itself in ensuring individual rights are protected, while substantive due process addresses the actual content or substance of the laws being applied and their impact on individual liberties.
No, collective rights are horrible compared to individual rights.
To what extent should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?
There is none, If we chose to put ourselves in a situation where we have rights. then the point of view can not effect rights, A right can not be changed it can only be denied. there fore there is no relationship between the rights of the individual and the collective other then that the collective has the power to stop the individual from implementing its right if it chooses to do so.
It is a contract that disregards the rights of the individual in favor of the "will" of the collective. The rights of the collective? Honor the rights of all individuals and the rights of the collective are undeniably protected. Claim the collective has rights that are superior to individual rights and the collective becomes a pool of human fodder for those clever enough to plunder. The will of the people? The people have spoken? I am speaking now, when you speak you will be speaking then and if you speak in these WA pages you are participating in a collective but are you speaking for the collective? Certainly, as many will attest, I don't speak for the collective. I speak for those who find themselves with headings such as ANOTHER VIEW or A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE and were I to foolishly enter into agreement with any social contract, my VIEW and PERSPECTIVE would be subject to the "will" of the collective. I am fortunate to be treated as an individual with certain rights as an individual in this WA site, and I am fortunate there is Dispute Resolution Center and a Community Advisory Team set in place to help me when I find myself being subjected to the "will" of the collective.I relish being an individual, I am proud and honored to be a part of this collective known as WikiAnswers.com, but I will always be an individual first and foremost and so will you.
Collective identity and collective rights are completely different because collective means the same thing which is a group of people so we know what they are both a group of people but we don't know what rights and identity are. So here I'll break It down for you. Identity means what people look like and rights mean like freedoms and laws.
There is a small difference between rights and public issues is simple. Rights involve the individual or small group and public generally involves the whole.
mobility rights, freedom of speech, individual and collective rights etc,etc.......
that the US mainly focus on individual rights and Canada focus on group rights
Collective rights are rights held by a specific group, for example first nations people have the right to fish and hunt freely in Canada. French people have the right to speak in their own language and to be understood.
Group rights are held by a group of people such as a council or board. Individual rights are held by one person and one person only. Historically group rights have been used to breach the rights of individuals.
There is a difference
democracy at persent has become a way of life as no other form of govt. gives the individuals this much rights, liberty to grow, freedom and so many other rights. It is the govt. of the majority but with minority rights. It promotes both individual as well as collective rights. Communism stands for the common use and sacrifice the ind. liberty and freedom. there is scope of supression of the rights of the individual.