0
It's the difference between accusing someone of a crime and actually convicting that person.
Allegations would be "RCMP have arrested Bob King, who allegedly killed his wife last month."
Evidence in that case would be bloody clothes, murder weapon, etc. Basically, any physical sign that the person committed that crime.
What else can I help you with?
What evidence is there to support the allegations of Clinton's criminal acts?
There is no conclusive evidence to support allegations of criminal acts by Clinton. Investigations have not resulted in any charges being brought against her.
What does the allegations are not sustained mean?
If it is in a court order, it means that the court did not find that there was sufficient evidence presented to support the allegations, and they are therefore not found to be fact. If it is in a different context, please rephrase and reask.
How do you answer false allegations?
With the truth, proof, evidence, witnesses, and a good lawyer.
What are the difference between preponderance and physical evidence?
Caca
Can previous allegations be used as bad character?
Previous allegations can sometimes be used as evidence to show a pattern of behavior or character traits, but they are generally not admissible in court to prove that someone has a predisposition to commit a certain type of misconduct. Each case is unique, and the admissibility of previous allegations as evidence of bad character will depend on the specific circumstances and the rules of evidence in that jurisdiction.
What is the difference between evidence and opinion?
The difference is that opinion is what YOU think and evidence has been proved and you KNOW its right x Hope that Helps!!
How do you defend against false allegations of terrorist threat?
Defending against false allegations of terrorism is much like defending against any other false allegations. The general idea is, lies are refuted by telling the truth. You would have to examine the basis for the allegations, whatever evidence or reports have been collected, and explain what really happened, and produce whatever confirming evidence you can, to prove your case.
What is the difference between best evidence and secondary evidence and conclusive evidence?
1 The difference between best and secondary evidence is best evidence is the legal doctrine that an original piece of evidence, particularly a document and secondary evidence is Secondary evidence is evidence that has been reproduced from an original document or substituted for an original item. For example, a photocopy of a document or photograph would be considered secondary evidence.
What is some good evidence to bring to criminal court?
Any and all evidence (and testimony of witnesses) necessary to prove, or refute, the allegations.
What is the difference between concrete and general evidence?
Concrete evidence is specific and fact-based, although general evidence is vague and and possibly an opinion.
What is the difference between a fact and a statement?
The difference between fact and statement is that a fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by evidence while a statement is a belief that may or may not be backed up with some type of evidence.
What is the truth behind the Harris Chicago scam allegations?
The truth behind the Harris Chicago scam allegations is that they are unsubstantiated and have not been proven. The allegations suggest that Harris Chicago engaged in fraudulent activities, but there is no concrete evidence to support these claims. It is important to wait for a thorough investigation to determine the validity of the allegations before making any conclusions.
