Ecological matter basically focuses on environmental related activities or it is environment concerned whereas economic is concerned or related to financial performance.For example in a leather manufacturing industry, if you control the environmental affects (on land, soil etc) of tanning process by reducing the chromium load (amount of chromium which is used in liquor for tanning process to convert raw skin into leather so that it cannot putrefy and becomes flexible or stretchable) that is an ecological process or initiative. Chromium can lead to various types of cancers in human being through water contamination.But if you reduce the power consumption for a particular operation or process that should be treated as an economic process or initiative.
Hope,this will help...
What is the difference between economic and non economic activities.?
the diifference between a political revolution and an economic revolution
the difference history of economic and history of economic thought
Economic = to do with money Economical = something that is money-saving
The difference between free and economic goods is the fact that, free goods don't cost us anything to be able to have and economic goods cost us to be able to get that service or good.
The difference between ecological succession from ecological backlash. Ecological Succession is the predictable changes in the ecosystem. Ecological Backlash is the unexpected and detriminal consequences of an enviromental modification which may outweigh that gains anticipated form the modification. THANK U
What is the difference between economic and non economic activities.?
The different between them is that the word economics and economic.
the diifference between a political revolution and an economic revolution
the difference history of economic and history of economic thought
Economic = to do with money Economical = something that is money-saving
Every species has its own ecological niche.
The difference between free and economic goods is the fact that, free goods don't cost us anything to be able to have and economic goods cost us to be able to get that service or good.
I would invert the order of the two words and use, in preference, the term ecological-economic rather economic ecological, but I see the term as a very useful and indeed vital, one.Something makes ecological-economic sense when it is concurrently consistent with the normal logic developed in standard economics (efficient allocation of resources to meet human needs with minimum waste), and also, meets human needs without doing any lasting damage to the major natural ecosystems of planet Earth. Functional natural ecosystems, are, fundamentally, essential to human life as much as to the viability of all living species, and are therefore a pre-condition of an enduring economic system.So rather than pursuing the vague objective of "balancing" ecological integrity and "economic benefit", we can instead pursue the better-defined aim of maximizing cumulative ecological-economic benefit. In effect, we aim to maximize human well-being subject to a strictly-observed ecological-integrity constraint. Where a projected "economic benefit" would transgress the ecological integrity constraint, it is in effect, uneconomic in the ecological-economic sense.
gay
management is a part of economic
Zoology work with biology and geology work with ecological nature.