answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Basically, the difference is your motivation. Breaking an 'unjust' law is called civil disobedience, and some very brave and principled people have done this to the benefit of us all. I put quotes around the word unjust because there is necessarily a personal judgement about whether or not a law is 'just'. In some cases it may seem obvious, like the heroic defiance of Rosa Parks. In some cases, an individual or a small number of people may be more interested in the fact that a law is simply inconvenient to them and is not necessarily unjust. In democracies, society as a whole determines what kind of laws will hold, and it is the nature of law that the actions of people will be restricted from time to time in order to bring about the greater good. In either case, someone engaging in civil disobedience will have to accept ahead of time the consequences of violating the law, and even correct civil disobedience will not always produce the desired result quickly.

So someone engaging in civil disobedience is doing so because of a real conviction that a law is itself harmful to everyone. A person just defying the law is interested in self-gain without regard for the people as a whole.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Defying the law means intentionally disregarding or disobeying a law without necessarily taking action against it. Breaking an unjust law involves intentionally violating a law that is considered unfair or immoral, with the aim of challenging or changing it through civil disobedience.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the difference between defying the law and breaking an unjust law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law
Related questions

What is the Difference between unjust and injustice?

"Unjust" is used to describe actions, decisions, or situations that are not fair or based on principles of morality. "Injustice" refers to the presence of unfairness, bias, discrimination, or violation of rights in a broader context, often involving systemic or societal issues. In other words, injustice encompasses a broader scope and impact compared to individual acts that are unjust.


Can there be legal cases in which the law is unjust?

Yes. Lawmakers are only human, and they can make unjust laws quite often. Many of the racially related laws from the segregation/civil rights era were unjust. If a black man and a white woman kissed, he was breaking the law, though she wasn't.


Difference between just and unjust laws?

Just laws are fair and promote justice and equality, while unjust laws are discriminatory and create inequalities. Just laws are based on ethical principles and protect the rights of all individuals, whereas unjust laws violate fundamental rights and harm certain groups or individuals. Ultimately, just laws contribute to a just society where everyone is treated with dignity and fairness.


How do government change according to polybius?

They Cycle Between Just And Unjust Forms Of Government.


How do you spell unjust?

UNJUST - unfair or undeserved


What is the comparative and superlative degree of unjust?

It is 'more unjust' and 'most unjust', since it has two syllables.


What is the difference between a scientific law and a fact?

Scientific fact is sometimes wrong from The Bible's perspective Laws are sometimes wrong, as Martin Luther king once said "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." - MLK


What is the duration of The Unjust?

The duration of The Unjust is 1.98 hours.


What is the difference between a scientific fact theory and a law?

Scientific fact is sometimes wrong from the Bible's perspective Laws are sometimes wrong, as martin luther king once said "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." - MLK


When was The Unjust created?

The Unjust was created on 2010-10-28.


According to Albert Barnes why was slavery wrong?

It was unjust, and cruel.


Did Gandhi risk his life saving India?

Yes. He was leading a rebellion and peacefully flouting laws he believed unjust. However, he was still breaking the laws and could have been severely punished.