Iceland is a unitary parliamentary republic, while Australia is a constitutional monarchy.
Pacta sunt servanda is a principle of international law and diplomacy with hold the international treaties but constitutional supremacy is the provision that generate for each countries to manage their law system in different ways.
There can be little difference between a parliamentary republic and a constitutional monarchy, except the President in a parliamentary republic (such as Germany or Ireland) has made a positive decision to become Head of State.
Pakistan- Federal Parliamentary Republic Iceland- Unitary Parliamentary Republic
Parliamentary is the British political system. Presidential is the American political system.
* rule of law, * juditial review* ,quasi theological term, * natura law[divine law] * ,highest ann unlimited power* ,making law, constitutional limitation
There is no difference, truly. To think the white race is the supreme race is, in itself, racist.
A Parliamentary Government can have a King and or Queen, it has provinces, and a Prime Minister to rule each province. A Constitutional Republic has a representative elected by the people and must follow laws for the Government.
Nothing they are the same.
In parliamentary system the Prime Minister is the real head but in Presidential form of government the President is the real head.
They both have different rights to be elected and have the right to vote.
They both have different rights to be elected and have the right to vote.