These are terms used in phonology to refer to different kinds of consonants.
The difference is rather difficult to explain, but very easy to recognize once you've heard it in actual speech. To speak an aspirated consonant, you have to expel air from your lungs as you are pronouncing it. The English stop-consonants p, t, and k are aspirated.
An unaspirated consonant does not have this exhalation from the lungs accompanying it. Those same consonants p, t, and k, are unaspirated when they immediately follow an s sound within the syllable (words like spoon, stop or skate).
To hear the difference, try this: Pronounce "I scream." The k-sound in "scream" is unaspirated. Now pronounce "ice cream." The k-sound here is aspirated.
As I said, this is a difficult thing to understand without listening for yourself
Aspirated stops and unaspirated stops are separate phonemes in Cochabamba Quechua. They can create minimal pairs, where a change in aspiration changes the meaning of a word.
There is a type of puzzle named spot the difference
The main difference between the two products is their ingredients.
Latin and Etruscan are completely unrelated languages, although Etruscan did influence Latin slightly.Unlike Latin, Etruscan is agglutinating, with nouns and verbs showing suffixed inflectional endings and ablaut in some cases.Nouns show four cases; singular and plural numbers, and masculine and feminine genders. Phonologically, Etruscan appears uncomplicated, with a four-vowel system and an apparent contrast between aspirated and unaspirated stops. The language shows phonetic change over time, with the loss and then re-establishment of word-internal vowels due to the effect of Etruscan's strong word-initial stress.
The difference between the two options refers to the distinctions or variations between the choices being compared.
Aspirated stops and unaspirated stops are separate phonemes in Cochabamba Quechua. They can create minimal pairs, where a change in aspiration changes the meaning of a word.
ոչ Pronounced in English "voch", with an aspirated 'ch'. Correct me if I'm wrong but the չ is the aspirated ch sound, the unaspirated equivalent is ճ. If you tell them to say voch with an unaspirated "ch" they'll end up saying "style" ոճ. My bad, Lystrop...thanks for correcting me!
yes
YES!!!!! As well as the pistons!
Aspirated foam is created by mixing foam concentrate with air using a foam inductor or aspirating nozzle, resulting in lower density and longer reach. Non-aspirated foam is created by directly injecting foam concentrate into water, resulting in higher density and shorter reach. Aspirated foam is typically used for longer distance applications, while non-aspirated foam is used for shorter distances with higher extinguishing capability.
Naturally aspirated engine are simply better than a smaller turbo charged engine. It has greater torque and no need for maintenance. You also have better control of the car while driving-(racing)
Ea82 is a naturally aspirated/fuel injected engine. Ea82t is a turbo. The "t" designating its status as a turbocharged engine. 115 hp as opposed to 90. ooooooooooh what a difference!
Yes, the material, thickness and possibly style of piston ring(top ring) can be different.
Lenis
Technically the Ferrari FXX is the fastest naturally aspirated car in the world, however the McClaren F1 is the fastest naturally aspirated production car.
No, normally that is the only part that is the same.
An internal combustion engine which draws in air for combustion without aid of turbo charger or similar, is said to be naturally aspirated.