0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Blake
Ezra
CoachAbsolute freedom refers to the unrestricted ability to make choices without any limitations, while relative freedom is the freedom one has within a particular context or under certain conditions. Absolute freedom implies no constraints whatsoever, while relative freedom acknowledges that freedom is often bounded by external factors or societal norms.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between positive freedom and negative freedom?
Positive freedom refers to the ability to pursue one's goals and fulfill one's potential, while negative freedom refers to the absence of external constraints or interference. Positive freedom focuses on the capacity to act, while negative freedom emphasizes the absence of obstacles.
What is the difference between positive and negative freedoms?
Positive freedom refers to the ability to pursue one's goals and fulfill one's potential, while negative freedom refers to the absence of external constraints or interference. Positive freedom focuses on the capacity to act, while negative freedom emphasizes the absence of obstacles.
What is the difference between negative and positive freedom?
Negative freedom refers to the absence of external constraints or interference, allowing individuals to act without obstacles. Positive freedom, on the other hand, involves the ability to actively pursue one's goals and fulfill one's potential.
What is the difference between the right of nature and the law of nature?
The right of nature refers to the inherent freedom individuals have to protect themselves and their interests, while the law of nature is a set of moral principles that govern human behavior and interactions.
What describes a major difference between the Enlightenment thinkers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke?
A major difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is their views on the state of nature. Hobbes believed it to be a state of war and chaos, necessitating a strong central authority, whereas Locke saw it as a state of freedom and equality, advocating for limited government intervention to protect natural rights.
