0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between Multiparty systems and two party system?
none
Which party system is most common in a dictatorship?
one party system*Which party system is most common in a Dictatorship?A. Multiparty SystemB. Bipartisan SystemC. One-Party SystemD. Two- Party System
Evolution of party system in jammu and kashmir?
Party system in j&k started from one party dominance ie n c to multiparty system
What. Sort of party system normally associated with proportional representation?
A multiparty system is normally associated with proportional representation.
What sort of party system is normally associated with proportional representation?
A multiparty system is normally associated with proportional representation.
When no one party has the majority in a multiparty system it must join with other parties to form a?
The parties would form a coalition.
What distinguishes single party system from multiparty system?
The number of parties and the ability to hold a truly democratic vote (it can not be democratic if you only have one choice to vote for).
What is the difference between the Texas political party system and the national political party system?
I would suggest you read the chapters that were assigned on the subject!
When no one party has the majority in a multiparty system it must join with other parties to form what?
The parties would form a coalition.
Does Italy have a multiparty system?
Yes, Italy has a multiparty system. However, there seems to be some consolidation going on. It will be interesting to see if it turns into a two or three party state. The parliamentary democracies of Europe, Spain, France, England, Germany, tend toward 2 or 3 party states. Italy seems headed in that direction. It will be interesting to watch.
How can diversity of view represents in a multiparty system be seen as both a strength and and a weakness?
the diversity of views represented in a multiparty system can be seen as a weakness because it often may lead to instability in government, it might be seen as a strength because it gives voters a much more meaningful choice among candidates and policy alternatives then the present two-party system.
Why is a multiparty system not dangerous for those under such a government?
There are a variety of reasons why a multiparty system is preferable to a one-party system. In general, these boil down to three major reasons. (These are not exhaustive.) 1) Multiplicity of Opinions: If there is an issue, there is more than one considered response. Congressmen are capable of presenting opinions that differ slightly or substantially from others. This forces people to rethink, defend, and tinker with their opinions to improve them. 2) Multiplicity of Focuses: If the rulers are all from one region or city of the country, they have a tendency to favor citizens there to the exclusion of all the remainder of the country. Each party in a multiparty system will have certain constituencies that support it, leader to a variety of differing regional interests being represented and none being entirely neglected. 3) Flexibility: In a dictatorial state or Leninist One-Party State, there are few real ways that the government can change without violence or a lot of political wrangling. (The Soviet Union went on for nearly 3 years between Stalin and Khrushchev without an official leader.) A multiparty system is not dependent on any particular party or individual for its survival. If a party disintegrates, there are still others waiting to fill in the void.
