answersLogoWhite

0

many things young padawan

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What is the difference between 3rd degree and fourth degree larceny?

The main difference between 3rd degree and 4th degree larceny is the value of the stolen property. In most jurisdictions, 3rd degree larceny involves theft of higher value items compared to 4th degree larceny, which involves theft of lower value items. The penalties for 3rd degree larceny are usually more severe than those for 4th degree larceny.


What's the difference between adjourn and remand?

"Adjourn" means to temporarily suspend a legal proceeding or meeting to a later date or time. "Remand" refers to sending a case back to a lower court for further consideration or action, typically ordered by a higher court.


What is the difference between remanding and reversing a case?

Remanding is a term used where I live meaning to hold the accused in jail until trial.Reversing a Case usually refers to reversing a decision, usually a Conviction is reversed to an Acquittal.BUTThose sneaky Lawyers very often use the same word in different contexts to mean wildly different things to layman. BUTNot this time. You explained it exactly the same way a sneaky lawyer would.


What is the difference between a DUI versus a DWI?

DWI is an acronym for Driving While Intoxicated means a Blood Alcohol Content of 0.08% or lower and is considered incompetent to drive While a DUI is an acronym for Driving Under the Influence i.e Blood Alcohol Content of 0.08 or higher which can lead to a large fine or jail time.


Did the US Supreme Court ever hear a case that did not go through the lower courts first?

Yes, the US Supreme Court has the authority to hear cases that bypass the lower courts under certain circumstances, such as cases involving disputes between states. Additionally, the Court may exercise its original jurisdiction to hear cases directly without them going through the lower courts first.

Related Questions

When did the lower Canada rebellion end?

1838


How did the Lower Canada Rebellion end?

The rebellion of lower Canada ended when upper & lower cananda became one due to the government wanting one country not two halves.


Who led the rebellion in lower Canada?

John Colborne,


Who were the leaders while the rebellion in lower Canada?

Steven Harper


What four factors contributed to the failure of the rebellion of Lower Canada?

The rebellion in Lower Canada failed because the command structure was flawed with no individual to command the troops. The communication was very bad between the troops. Armour couldn't get off the beach, and the point of attack was chosen incorrectly.


Who was the Rebellion of 1837 with?

Canada, upper and lower after frustrations with political reform.


Were the uper and lower Canada rebellion against or with each other?

They were against each other


What caused upper Canada rebellion?

the rebellions happened because of the rebellions in lower Canada and they wanted a change in their government as well


Who won the Rebellion of 1837-1838 in lower Canada?

timber trade, transportation Also it had to do with the government Edit********* The rebellion in Lower Canada happened because the merchants and people with money, who owned land were the only ones aloud to vote, while the farmers and lower class people with no land were not aloud.ys i agree but how did it involve transportation......


What were the long-term results of the rebellion in lower Canada in 1837?

What were the long-term results of the war?


What was the effects of the rebellions in 1837-1838 in Upper and Lower Canada?

I don't know. This is the answer I was looking for, and that I've been looking for 1 hour now. Without the answer, I can't finish my history project, because we can't start unless we prove what we know. ====================================================================== Albert Einstein once said, "The formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution." He is quoted as having said that if he had one hour to save the world he would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution. In other words, you have to figure out exactly what the problem is before you can begin to solve it. Your question asks about a "rebellion of 1837 between upper and lower Canada" and whether it is still affecting us. There was no rebellion "between" Upper Canada and Lower Canada. There was a rebellion in Upper Canada. There was a much more serious rebellion in Lower Canada. They happened around the same period of time. But it was not Upper Canada versus Lower Canada. You can search for an answer to your question until the cows come home, but you will not find one. You haven't asked the right question.


What were Mackenzies reasons for calling for rebellion in Upper Canada?

A bad year for crops led to a recession, and in the following years, the banks had begun to tighten credit and recall loans, so when Mackenzie heard of the lower Canada rebellion he decided to start his own rebellion.