Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The purpose of Basel II, which was initially published in June 2004, is to create an international standard that banking regulators can use when creating regulations about how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against the types of financial and operational risks banks face. Advocates of Basel II believe that such an international standard can help protect the international financial system from the types of problems that might arise should a major bank or a series of banks collapse. In practice, Basel II attempts to accomplish this by setting up rigorous risk and capital management requirements designed to ensure that a bank holds capital reserves appropriate to the risk the bank exposes itself to through its lending and investment practices. Generally speaking, these rules mean that the greater risk to which the bank is exposed, the greater the amount of capital the bank needs to hold to safeguard its solvency and overall economic stability.For more details please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_IIAbove is copied from this place only.
I, II, III, and IV Tammy :p
The Risk Weighted Asset, or RWA, represents the credit risk of a bank. Under Basel II, the bank must hold REAL capital of at least 8% of the RWA.
TrustworthyTrustful
A 1008 form is a Uniform Underwriting and Transmittal Summary. It includes (I) Borrower and Property Information, (II) Mortgage Information, (III) Underwriting Information, and (IV) Seller, Contract, an Contact Information.
one is 2 and the other is 3
in basel II there is no capital buffer but in basel III buffer is 4.5 % to be achieved upto jan 16 to absorb the shock
Basel I dealt with Capital Requirements for Banks. Basel II deal with Capital Requirements for Banks, Supervisor Review and Regulations, Market Displine. Basel III is same as Basel II with the enhancement of having Capital Buffer upto 4.5% which is not a part of Basel II.
Magazine
The main difference is that the Basel I accord mainly focused on capital requirements for banks. The Basel II adds supervision and market discipline to these capital requirement through the "Three Pillar" concept. The first pillar is about capital requirement. The second pillar is about regulation and supervision. The third pillar describes market discipline.
greater potential for addiction
About 20hp.
The Challenger II has an all steel frame and the Challenger III has an alloy frame; I don't know what the alloy is.
Basel II is the second set of recommendations released by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. These recommendations are directed towards international governments for the purpose of creating a standardized international banking system.
They both originate from Japan but,Kendo = (i) Sport. (ii) There is CONTACT between players. (iii) Played with a shinai (bamboo sword)Kenjutsu = (i) Cultural art. (ii) NO CONTACT between players (or else they will cut the other person) .(iii) Demonstrated with a katana (metal sword)Hope this is helpful!
The Basel II was originally published in 2001 to a small segment and was released to the entire population in June 2004. A revised version was published in 2008.
Basel I was an international accord to set minimum levels of capital for banks. It was designed to ensure that lenders were sufficiently well capitalized to protect depositors and the financial system. The first Basel Accord however was replaced by a new accord, Basel II. The new accord was introduced to keep pace with the increased sophistication of lenders' operations and risk management and overcome some of the distortions caused by the lack of risk assessment divisions in Basel I. Basel I required lenders to calculate a minimum level of capital based on a single risk weight for each of a limited number of asset classes, e.g., mortgages, consumer lending, corporate loans, exposures to sovereigns. Basel II goes well beyond this, allowing some lenders to use their own risk measurement models to calculate required regulatory capital whilst seeking to ensure that lenders establish a culture with risk management at the heart of the organization up to the highest managerial level.