0
Sectional division over slavery was part of what led to the Civil War. Both 'sections' of the country, the North and South, were vehement with their opinions about slavery. This led to both parts of the country feeling separated and only worrying about the desires of their 'section' and not thinking like a country as a whole.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Beau
Maxine
DevinSectional division over slavery refers to the deep political and social rift that existed between the Northern and Southern United States in the 19th century over the issue of slavery. The North generally opposed slavery and sought its abolition, while the South defended the institution of slavery as vital to its economy and way of life. This divide ultimately led to the American Civil War.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What effect did the Kansas act of 1854 have on the conflict over slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 led to widespread violence in the Kansas Territory between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act allowed the settlers to decide through popular sovereignty whether Kansas would allow slavery, intensifying the sectional conflict over slavery in the lead-up to the Civil War.
What would have allowed slavery in kansas which widened sectional divisions?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed popular sovereignty to decide the issue of slavery in Kansas, leading to violence and bloodshed as pro- and anti-slavery settlers clashed. This further polarized the North and South and worsened sectional divisions that eventually led to the American Civil War.
What was a result of the banning of slavery north of the 36 30 line?
The banning of slavery north of the 36 30 line as outlined in the Missouri Compromise of 1820 helped to temporarily ease sectional tensions over the expansion of slavery in the United States. However, it ultimately contributed to the larger conflict over states' rights and the power of the federal government, which would culminate in the American Civil War.
The supreme court ruling in Dred Scott v Stanford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision?
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision intensified sectional conflict by reinforcing the divide between slave states and free states, fueling tensions over the expansion of slavery into new territories. The ruling was seen as a victory for pro-slavery advocates and a setback for those seeking to abolish slavery, further polarizing the nation on the issue.
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision-?
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 worsened sectional conflict by declaring that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and could not sue in the federal courts. This decision further entrenched divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and fed into the growing tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
