Chattle slavery makes the slave the property of the slave owner.
Chattel Slavery
A form of slavery that makes slaves of the children of slave women
There was no penalty for raping a slave. The slave was the owner's property. She had no rights.
Slavery and indentured servitude both require the person serving to be complete slave to their master. The only difference is, an indentured servant choses to be a slave to pay off a debt, and when their dept is fully paid they no longer have to be a slave. But a slave is forced to be a slave, and their master owns them.
chattel~ apex
NO. If a person were to theoretically self-enslave, e.g. they freely renounced all rights to self-control to work for a master in order to have the master provide him with accommodations and food, this would be a barter. However, this is not what happens in slavery. Slavery is the buying and selling of humans, so the transactors are the master-to-be and the slaver/slave market salesperson. The slave is the object of the transaction, not a party in the transaction. This is a typical currency transaction where the master-to-be pays the slaver for possession of the chattel property (the slave) and currency transactions are the opposite of barter.
It was customary to beat defiant slaves, but remember that if the slave is the property of the master, then the master is free to inflict any punishment that he chooses.
Chattel Slavery
A form of slavery that makes slaves of the children of slave women
No. they were considered property.
None as the modern concepts of human rights and civil rights did not exist. A slave's master owned the slave like any other property and could do anything he/she chose to the slave at any time even without a reason, including kill the slave as he/she would cattle.
necessary evil
There is no positive side to slavery. A person is considered property when they are a slave and treated like property.
A slave- in ANY state- was considered property. Property does not have rights.
There was no penalty for raping a slave. The slave was the owner's property. She had no rights.
Slavery and indentured servitude both require the person serving to be complete slave to their master. The only difference is, an indentured servant choses to be a slave to pay off a debt, and when their dept is fully paid they no longer have to be a slave. But a slave is forced to be a slave, and their master owns them.
chattel~ apex