In Furman's defense on slavery, he essentially utilizes the Bible to justify the institution; furthermore, he also states that the maintenance of slavery is necessary for the good of society at the time.
Chat with our AI personalities
Richard Furman, a Baptist pastor, argued in his exposition on slavery that slavery was morally justified because it was practiced in The Bible. He believed that it was a natural social order where slaves were well-treated and slavery was a means of civilizing and Christianizing Africans. Furman's views reflected the pro-slavery arguments prevalent in the American South during the 19th century.
Pro-slavery refers to the belief that owning slaves is acceptable or beneficial, while anti-slavery refers to the opposition against slavery and the belief in the equality and freedom of all individuals, regardless of race.
Pro slavery refers to the advocacy or support for the institution of slavery, where individuals believe in owning and exploiting other people as property. Anti slavery, on the other hand, opposes the practice of slavery and advocates for the abolition of slavery, promoting equality and freedom for all individuals.
An abolitionist is someone who actively works to end slavery, while a pro-slavery person supports and advocates for the continuation of slavery. Abolitionists believe in the equal rights and freedom of all individuals, while pro-slavery individuals believe in the right to own and exploit others as property.
Ablution of slavery refers to the act of cleansing or getting rid of the institution of slavery. It implies the effort to eradicate and end all forms of slavery or servitude within a society or community.
Pro-slavery refers to beliefs, actions, or policies that support or advocate for the institution of slavery, in which individuals are treated as property and forced to work without pay.