0
That depends on the time and place the slave owner lived in. Slaves in the antebellum South were legally classified as domestic animals, like cows or sheep. So a slave owner was perfectly free to kill a slave that he owned. The only reason to avoid killing them is that slaves, like other domestic animals, were worth money. It would be foolish to buy a slave only to kill him or her. Nonetheless, if a slave master wished to kill a slave, he had every legal right to do so.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Beau
Fran
ReneThe consequences for a slave owner killing their slave varied based on the time and place. In some instances, there may have been legal repercussions such as fines or imprisonment, but enforcement and punishment were often lax when it involved a slave. Additionally, the social norms of the time often supported or justified violence against slaves, making it less likely for a slave owner to face significant consequences for killing their slave.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What happened if the runaway slave were caught?
If a runaway slave was caught, they would be harshly punished, often beaten, tortured, or even killed by their owner or authorities. They would then be returned to their owner and likely face even more severe consequences as a form of deterrence for future escape attempts.
What do you call a person that own a slave?
A person who owns a slave is typically referred to as a "slave owner" or "master."
What do you call a person that owns a slave?
A person who owns a slave is commonly referred to as a slaveholder or slave owner.
What was the fee for killing a slave?
In ancient Rome, the fee for killing a slave was typically paid to the owner as compensation for the loss of property. The fee varied depending on the value of the slave and the circumstances of the killing.
What was the purpose of the slave code?
the slave code was a law saying if a slave owner was to killed one of his slaves he would not be punished.
