answersLogoWhite

0

That depends on the time and place the slave owner lived in. Slaves in the antebellum South were legally classified as domestic animals, like cows or sheep. So a slave owner was perfectly free to kill a slave that he owned. The only reason to avoid killing them is that slaves, like other domestic animals, were worth money. It would be foolish to buy a slave only to kill him or her. Nonetheless, if a slave master wished to kill a slave, he had every legal right to do so.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
More answers

The consequences for a slave owner killing their slave varied based on the time and place. In some instances, there may have been legal repercussions such as fines or imprisonment, but enforcement and punishment were often lax when it involved a slave. Additionally, the social norms of the time often supported or justified violence against slaves, making it less likely for a slave owner to face significant consequences for killing their slave.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What happened to a slave owner if they killed their slave?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp