A nuclear bomb is far more destructive than any previous type of weapon, and it can be used to kill thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people all at once, depending upon the size of the bomb and the location where it is dropped (the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed hundreds of thousands of people). The moral basis of existence would seem to be a respect for our fellow human beings and for their lives. To kill people in such wholesale quantities, and so indiscriminately, shows a lack of respect for human life. Normally, we try to be very careful about killing people. Even in times of war, we normally try to kill only enemy soldiers or enemy insurgents, and not to kill civilians who are not involved in the fighting. A nuclear bomb just kills everyone in a given area, including babies, and others who have no involvement in whatever conflict has motivated the bombing. Human life becomes very cheap in such circumstances. Life become irrelevant, meaningless. People are of no more importance than ants, and can be snuffed out as easily, when you are dealing with nuclear war. This would appear to be an immoral attitude. One can also argue that there are some circumstances which would justify the use of nucear weapons - a good case can be made for the use of atomic bombs in WW II. Nonetheless, there are serious moral issues involved in killing so many people, by means of a weapon of mass destruction.
The author may suggest that using a nuclear bomb has severe ethical implications as it results in massive loss of life and destruction on an unprecedented scale. It challenges the fundamental values of human decency and morality by showing a willingness to resort to extreme violence. It can also disrupt the balance of power and escalate conflicts, leading to further moral dilemmas.
Aristotle is the author of the famous book "Politics."
The author uses the rhetorical technique of repetition to emphasize key points and make their argument more persuasive.
The author of the short declamation piece "Conscience" is unknown. This piece is often used as a speech or dialogue for declamation contests.
The author includes information about the Philosopher to provide historical context and background on the topic being discussed. Additionally, including details about the Philosopher's beliefs or views can help support the author's argument or perspective on the subject matter.
The author offers definitions of words in order to clarify the terms for the reader -Apex ;)
G. Existence has written: 'Village'
Lacy Dancer has written: 'Lightning strikes twice' 'Lightning strikes twice'
Edward Levinson has written: 'I break strikes!' -- subject(s): Strikes and lockouts
Maurice Goldbloom has written: 'Strikes under the new deal' -- subject(s): Strikes and lockouts
Frank M. Kimmerle has written: 'Interfacial electrochemistry at the dropping mercury electrode' -- subject(s): Dropping mercury Electrodes, Electrochemistry, Electrodes, Dropping mercury
Keith Brooker has written: 'The Hull strikes of 1911' -- subject(s): History, Labor unions, Strikes and lockouts
G. Cahen has written: 'Nuclear engineering' -- subject(s): Nuclear engineering, Nuclear physics
Jacob M. Moses has written: 'The law applicable to strikes' -- subject(s): Labor laws and legislation, Strikes and lockouts
James A. Semata has written: 'Teachers' strikes and their impact in labor relations' -- subject(s): Collective bargaining, Strikes and lockouts, Teachers
Michael P. Hemsworth has written: 'Nuclear materials' -- subject(s): Nuclear waste, Nuclear reactors, Nuclear chemistry, Materials
N.F Robarts has written: 'Strikes and lock-outs'
Constance Braithwaite has written: 'Are strikes a pacifist method?'