0
contradict each other.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
nea
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the primary source of history?
A primary source is an eyewitness account to an event.
How did Thucydides change the way history was written?
The Thucydides changed the way history was written by using documents and eyewitness accounts to help him.This is how the Thucydides changed the way history was written.
Match these two definitions with the words they define definition A a historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event definition B a document interpreting eyewitne?
(A) primary source; (B) secondary source
Why did emperor Nero blame Christians for the big fire in Rome and persecute them?
Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecuted them for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.
Why do historians try to gather as many sources as possible about a particular event?
To judge the accounts against each other to see if there is bias (Apex)
A document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event?
It's a secondary source.
Is eyewitness testimony usually accurate?
Eyewitness testimony can be unreliable due to factors such as memory distortion, suggestion, and stress. Research indicates that memory can be influenced by leading questions and external factors, leading to inaccuracies in recalling events. Courts now recognize the limitations of eyewitness testimony and consider corroborating evidence to determine its reliability.
A historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event A document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event.?
A historical document written by an eyewitness would be a primary source, providing firsthand information and perspective on an event. On the other hand, a document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event would be a secondary source, offering analysis and interpretation of the primary sources.
What is the importance of an eyewitness testimony?
Eyewitness testimony can provide valuable information in legal cases by offering firsthand accounts of events. However, it is also important to consider factors that can affect the accuracy of such testimony, such as memory biases, suggestibility, and stress during the event. corroboration from other evidence is often necessary to support eyewitness testimony.
What does it mean to be an eyewitness?
An eyewitness is an individual who has observed an event. The event witnessed can be malice, violent, and even life threatening. In addition, an eyewitness's recollection of an event can lead to the detainment of a perpetrator.
What does eyewitness account mean?
To see an event.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of witness testimony?
The advantages of eyewitness accounts are vivid description of the incident which helps the investigating authority in tracking the culprits. There are murder cases where no survivor being left, the eyewitness accounts play pivotal role in settlement property, insurance claims. There are certain disadvantages like the eyewitness accounts being faulty one, thereby making the case more complicated. Sometimes the eyewitness accounts may be biased, after the witness has been bribed to give accounts on the contrary,impairing the case of the suffered.
What are some Kraken eyewitness accounts?
Kraken eyewitness accounts can happen anywhere at any time. Most Kraken encounters happen in the Indian ocean and in scandenavia. When you are in those parts of the world watch out for the Kraken!
How to make a sentence using the word eyewitness?
An eyewitness can often be the worse witness, is a popular sentence containing the word eyewitness.
The writer believes that eyewitness accounts of a crime aren't always reliable?
Eyewitness accounts can be influenced by factors like stress, memory distortion, and perception biases, leading to inaccuracies. Therefore, relying solely on eyewitness testimony can introduce errors into the investigation and legal process. It's crucial to corroborate such accounts with physical evidence and other sources of information.
What are the names of two colonists who gave eyewitness accounts of the first thanksgiving?
Edward Winslow and William Bradford were the two colonist who gave the eyewitness accounts of the first Thanksgiving. The Indians and the settlers celebrated the fall harvest.
The writer believes that eyewitness accounts of a crime aren't always reliable.?
true
