0
What else can I help you with?
What is the primary source of history?
A primary source is an eyewitness account to an event.
How did Thucydides change the way history was written?
The Thucydides changed the way history was written by using documents and eyewitness accounts to help him.This is how the Thucydides changed the way history was written.
Match these two definitions with the words they define definition A a historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event definition B a document interpreting eyewitne?
(A) primary source; (B) secondary source
Why did emperor Nero blame Christians for the big fire in Rome and persecute them?
Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecuted them for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.
Why do historians try to gather as many sources as possible about a particular event?
To judge the accounts against each other to see if there is bias (Apex)
A document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event?
It's a secondary source.
A historical document written by an eyewitness or someone who lived through an event A document interpreting eyewitness accounts and other accounts of an event.?
First one is a primary source, because it's from their "Primary View" second one is a secondary source, since they didn't see it in their Primary View, it was told to them. So the answer for apex is (A) primary source; (B) secondary source
What is the importance of an eyewitness testimony?
Eyewitness testimony can provide valuable information in legal cases by offering firsthand accounts of events. However, it is also important to consider factors that can affect the accuracy of such testimony, such as memory biases, suggestibility, and stress during the event. corroboration from other evidence is often necessary to support eyewitness testimony.
What does it mean to be an eyewitness?
An eyewitness is an individual who has observed an event. The event witnessed can be malice, violent, and even life threatening. In addition, an eyewitness's recollection of an event can lead to the detainment of a perpetrator.
How many eyewitness accounts are there of Jesus?
There are four main eyewitness accounts of Jesus in the Bible, known as the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
Why do eyewitness accounts vary?
Eyewitness accounts vary due to several factors, including individual perception, memory recall, and the influence of stress or trauma during the event. Factors such as lighting, distance, and the presence of distractions can affect how an event is perceived. Additionally, personal biases and subsequent discussions with others can alter a witness's recollection. These elements contribute to the inherent subjectivity of human memory, leading to differing accounts of the same incident.
Is eyewitness testimony usually accurate?
No, eyewitness testimony can be very inaccurate. When a person sees an event, they filter it through all their experiences, feelings, knowledge, and assumptions. Quite often, what comes out is a very incomplete picture of what happened. Police use eyewitness accounts most effectively when there are many eyewitnesses. They get all the stories and then piece together a more complete picture of an event.
What does eyewitness account mean?
To see an event.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of witness testimony?
The advantages of eyewitness accounts are vivid description of the incident which helps the investigating authority in tracking the culprits. There are murder cases where no survivor being left, the eyewitness accounts play pivotal role in settlement property, insurance claims. There are certain disadvantages like the eyewitness accounts being faulty one, thereby making the case more complicated. Sometimes the eyewitness accounts may be biased, after the witness has been bribed to give accounts on the contrary,impairing the case of the suffered.
What are some Kraken eyewitness accounts?
Kraken eyewitness accounts can happen anywhere at any time. Most Kraken encounters happen in the Indian ocean and in scandenavia. When you are in those parts of the world watch out for the Kraken!
The writer believes that eyewitness accounts of a crime aren't always reliable?
Eyewitness accounts can be influenced by factors like stress, memory distortion, and perception biases, leading to inaccuracies. Therefore, relying solely on eyewitness testimony can introduce errors into the investigation and legal process. It's crucial to corroborate such accounts with physical evidence and other sources of information.
How to make a sentence using the word eyewitness?
An eyewitness can often be the worse witness, is a popular sentence containing the word eyewitness.
