0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Blake
Rafa
Taiga
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did philosophers feel about monarchy?
Some philosophers throughout history have supported monarchy, arguing that it provides stability and unity to society. Others have criticized monarchy, believing it grants too much power to a single ruler and can lead to tyranny. Overall, views on monarchy among philosophers vary depending on their beliefs about political structure and individual rights.
Whose major contribution was drawing on the Greek philosopher Aristotle to defend rationally basic Christian convictions?
The major contribution was made by Thomas Aquinas, a medieval theologian and philosopher. Aquinas sought to reconcile faith and reason by incorporating Aristotelian philosophy into Christian theology, arguing that reason and revelation both lead to truth. His work is considered influential in the development of Scholasticism.
How does this perspective critique logic by claiming that logic is an invention of humanity?
This perspective critiques logic by arguing that it is a creation of humans, rather than a universal truth.
Is arguing logically a persuasive technique?
Yes, arguing logically can be a persuasive technique because it focuses on presenting clear, rational reasoning to support a particular viewpoint or argument. Logical arguments can be effective in convincing others because they rely on sound evidence and reasoning rather than emotions or manipulation.
What are the different types of fallacies and can you provide examples of each?
There are several types of fallacies, including ad hominem (attacking the person instead of the argument), straw man (misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack), appeal to authority (using an authority figure as evidence in an argument), and slippery slope (arguing that one thing will lead to another with no evidence). An example of ad hominem would be "You can't trust his opinion on politics because he's a terrible person."
