Albert Barnes, a 19th-century theologian, defended slavery by arguing that it was permissible according to biblical teachings. His support for slavery was refuted by many abolitionists and scholars who pointed out that his interpretation of The Bible was flawed, and that slavery was morally wrong and violated human rights.
Most human beings would say that slavery is wrong. Just because something is found in The Bible does not justify it being done. Consider that rape, incest, and murder are also found in the Bible as are most of the wayward ways of mankind.
Another contributor said:Albert Barnes was an American theologian born in New York in 1798. He was a leader among the New School Presbyterians and a strong supporter of abolition.Barnes made an exhaustive study of The Bible passages addressing slavery since many passages could only be interpreted as both approving and promoting slavery which was a common form of life for many people in biblical times. It must also be remembered that different parts of the Bible were written at different times by different authors. It is more an anthology of theological writings that span a long period of time. There is no single theme running throughout, it is a conglomeration of writings, some contradictory, which explains the infinite interpretations that exist today.Barnes concluded, after his exhaustive study of all its passages, that the institution of slavery was in direct conflict with the primary principles we are to take from scripture including:equality,the brotherhood of God's familythe "golden rule,"spiritual growth, andGod's abhorrence of oppressionAlbert Barnes thought slavery was a sinful practice and it should cease and transform into employment. As for his own times, he is quoted as stating: "There is no power out of the church that could sustain slavery an hour, if it were not sustained in it." Think about that. Slavery may have been obliterated sooner in American history had it not been promoted from the pulpit. Barnes was an interesting man whose thinking was far ahead of his times.
An abolitionist is someone who actively works to end slavery, while a pro-slavery person supports and advocates for the continuation of slavery. Abolitionists believe in the equal rights and freedom of all individuals, while pro-slavery individuals believe in the right to own and exploit others as property.
James Henry Hammond, a staunch advocate for slavery, would likely argue that slavery should not end as he believed in the economic and social benefits of the institution. He may have contended that slavery was a cornerstone of society and essential for maintaining order and prosperity in the South. Hammond often defended slavery as a positive good that benefited both enslaved people and slaveowners.
James Henry Hammond was a strong advocate for the continuation of slavery. He believed that slavery was a necessary and beneficial institution for the economy and society of the Southern United States. Hammond argued that slaves were better off under the care of benevolent masters and that ending slavery would lead to chaos and destruction.
Because the other half are right.
Slavery is against the laws of nature.
Most human beings would say that slavery is wrong. Just because something is found in The Bible does not justify it being done. Consider that rape, incest, and murder are also found in the Bible as are most of the wayward ways of mankind.
He said slavery was wrong and should stop.
Another contributor said:Albert Barnes was an American theologian born in New York in 1798. He was a leader among the New School Presbyterians and a strong supporter of abolition.Barnes made an exhaustive study of The Bible passages addressing slavery since many passages could only be interpreted as both approving and promoting slavery which was a common form of life for many people in biblical times. It must also be remembered that different parts of the Bible were written at different times by different authors. It is more an anthology of theological writings that span a long period of time. There is no single theme running throughout, it is a conglomeration of writings, some contradictory, which explains the infinite interpretations that exist today.Barnes concluded, after his exhaustive study of all its passages, that the institution of slavery was in direct conflict with the primary principles we are to take from scripture including:equality,the brotherhood of God's familythe "golden rule,"spiritual growth, andGod's abhorrence of oppressionAlbert Barnes thought slavery was a sinful practice and it should cease and transform into employment. As for his own times, he is quoted as stating: "There is no power out of the church that could sustain slavery an hour, if it were not sustained in it." Think about that. Slavery may have been obliterated sooner in American history had it not been promoted from the pulpit. Barnes was an interesting man whose thinking was far ahead of his times.
Bleeding Kansas showed America that they had a say in their fate of slavery. It opened their eyes to see that it was wrong.
What is the 1787 convention say about slavery?
.....slavery IS banned......
to expand slavery
Slavery is not right. It goes against basic human rights and ethical principles as it involves the unjust exploitation and control of individuals. Slavery has been universally condemned as a violation of human dignity and freedom.
Albert
I would say 5'8 or 5'9.