0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Fran
TaigaYeoman were small-scale farmers who typically owned their own land and worked alongside their family, while plantation owners were wealthy individuals who owned large tracts of land and enslaved laborers to work on their plantations. Yeoman typically focused on subsistence agriculture or small-scale cash crops, while plantation owners produced cash crops on a large scale for commercial profit.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between a yeoman and a plantation owner?
A yeoman was a small landowner or farmer who owned and cultivated their land independently, while a plantation owner typically owned large estates worked by enslaved laborers, producing cash crops like tobacco or cotton. Yeoman farmers usually lived on their land, while plantation owners often resided elsewhere and supervised operations remotely.
Why did many yeoman farmers feel resentment toward rich planters yet still support the institution of slavery?
Yeoman farmers resented rich planters because they wielded significant economic and political power. However, they still supported slavery because they believed it was essential for maintaining the social and economic hierarchy that benefited them as white landowners. Slavery provided them with a cheap labor source and allowed them to compete economically with the planters.
