Some say you may feel pressured into becoming a homosexual because there is nobody of the other sex around you, and you might feel lonely and not know anyone of the other gender. Of course, sexual orientation seems to be a fixed quality within most people, so being exposed to members of the same sex most likely won't push you to become gay unless you already have some tendencies in that direction.
The disadvantages stated by the ACLU are among the following:
1. A lack of insights from students of the other sex. If boys and girls think differently and do things differently like the proponents of single-sex education claim, then wouldn't it be good to get to learn from those differences? Couldn't the focus of the studies get quite narrow if there aren't people with different views, insights, ways of life, and ways of doing things?
2. The reinforcement of stereotypes. With a single gender, gender stereotypes are likely to go unchecked.
3. Perhaps less insights into the real world. In the real world, there are supposedly guy ways of doing things, and girl ways of doing things, and to be exposed to just one or another could be traumatic when you are finally exposed to traits of the other sex - assuming such traits exist. Learning about dating would have to be put off until after one is an adult under the law.
4. Possibly getting assigned to a classroom other than what is most suitable for you. That could be a living nightmare for you. What if you need more roughness, competition, and activity than other girls or more cooperation, neatness, beauty, quiet, privacy, and indoor time than other boys? What if the things that make you feel the best about yourself and make it easiest to learn are denied? A masculine girl or a feminine boy is not likely to change and keep their sense of self and self-esteem intact. So why can't they be trained according to what is closest to the nature they already have? Why would they have to be taught in ways that don't work for them and stunted in their education until they are free to adopt the other identity and start to learn certain things when it is way too late for them?
Some disadvantages of single-sex schools may include limited exposure to diverse perspectives, reduced opportunities for social interaction with the opposite sex, and reinforcement of gender stereotypes. Additionally, single-sex schools may not fully prepare students for coeducational environments they may encounter in college or the workforce.
Oh, it is probably close to 80-85% today. Some places may be higher.
well a great way to meet girls is at the movies or when your out with your friends... you could ask them about girls they know. Dont be afraid to go up to girls you see and talk to them
54 universities and colleges, 1,198 public schools.
The acceptance rate for college applicants varies widely depending on the institution. Generally, acceptance rates range from single digits to over 50% at different colleges and universities. It is important to research and apply to schools that align with your academic profile and goals to increase your chances of admission.
It depends on the type of school. Mostly public schools do not need uniforms. But in Catholic schools you almost always have to.AND IN MOST christian schools and private schools they about 90% of the time have to wear uniforms
yes, single-sex schools are better than co-ed because it helps you to concentrate on your studies and not on the opposite sex
No.
Single sex schools have been around for centuries, with some dating back to the Middle Ages. However, the concept gained popularity in the United States during the 19th century as a way to provide separate educational opportunities for boys and girls.
No.
yes, single-sex schools are better than co-ed because it helps you to concentrate on your studies and not on the opposite sex
10000
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question as it depends on individual preferences and learning styles. Some people may thrive in co-educational settings where they can interact with a diverse group of students, while others may benefit from the focused environment and tailored teaching methods offered by single-sex schools. It is important to consider the specific needs and preferences of the student when making this decision.
The percentage of people who go to single sex schools and turn out to be either gay or bi-sexual is 21.67%.
Single-sex schools should only be banned if they perpetuate harmful gender stereotypes or limit educational opportunities for students. Otherwise, some argue that single-sex schools can offer unique learning environments that cater to the specific needs of students. The decision to ban single-sex schools should be based on whether they promote equality and provide a well-rounded education for all students.
F o c k this
There are many single sex schools and they are even successful. There is no overall harm in such schools. Some families parents educate their daughters only in girls school so there is certainly a need for such schools. Obviously, you always have a choice to enroll as coed.
Yes, there are all girls schools and all boys schools. But of course their are mixed ones too.